Evaluation of the Efficiency of Word Prediction Software to Text Input Speed for Tetraplegia
Smartwrite
Phase 1 Evaluation of the Influence of Settings of Word Prediction Software (Phase 1)and the Efficiency of Rehabilitation Programm (Phase 2)to Text Input Speed for People With Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Computers now play an important role in the lives of most individuals.Access to computers is crucial for people with disabilities and may improve their quality of life. The use of computers can facilitate mainstreaming at school, for example, and the Internet may provide a valuable means of communication. However, the use of computers requires a certain degree of motor ability. People with motor disabilities frequently experience difficulties using a standard keyboard and standard pointing input systems such as a mouse. Many solutions exist to facilitate computer access, depending on the person's specific impairments and the purpose for which the computer is used. The most common solution relies on the use of a virtual keyboard which is directly displayed on the computer screen. The selection of the desired key on the virtual keyboard can be handled by a large variety of input devices, from a microgravity mouse to single switch devices supplemented by a process of dynamic scanning of the keyboard.Although such assistive devices render computers accessible to people with disabilities, the actual inputting of text can be very slow. A method to increase text input speed is to display words which are predicted from the letters previously typed. Word prediction reduces the number of necessary key strokes by avoiding having to type the whole word. The effect on text input speed is, however uncertain and results in the literature are inconclusive. Indeed, word prediction software provide a enhancement of cognitive load which decrease text input speed.The reduction of cognitive load could therefore be based in part on the optimization settings of the software and / or achievement of a rehabilitation program.Our hypothesis are for people with spinal cord injury : i) optimization settings word prediction software and ii) a rehabilitation program could improve the text input speed.The investigators propose to study the influence of settings word prediction software on text input speed and the influence of a rehabilitation program provided by a therapist, focused on word prediction software to help integrate them. The aim is to increase the performance of people with spinal cord injury and their satisfaction. The first phase of this research is to select the word prediction software and configuration that provides the best user support.The second phase corresponds to the objective of evaluating the efficiency of a rehabilitation program .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 6, 2018
September 1, 2018
2 years
September 17, 2013
September 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Text Input Speed at 1 month
text input speed (characters/minute)
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from Errors at 1 month
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Prediction use at 1 month
Phase after every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Satisfaction
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Cognitive load at 1 month
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Change from Speed sensation at 1 month
Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month
Study Arms (3)
Rehabilitation Group
EXPERIMENTALPeople with spinal cord injury who have a rehabilitation program on a word prediction software with an occupational therapist.
Self Training at Home Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeople with spinal cord injury who don't have a rehabilitation program with an occupational therapist but who have instructions for learning at home on a word prediction software
No treatment Group
NO INTERVENTIONPeople with spinal cord injury who don't have instructions, rehabilitation programm on word prediction software. They have no treatment.
Interventions
Rehabilitation program with an occupational therpasit 3 training sessions (one hour) per week for a month (12 sessions)
Only instructions for a self - training at home
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Tetraplegia (between C4 and C8 ASIA) more than 6 months.
- Can read and write
- No visual problems preventing the use of computers.
- Recipient of a Health Insurance Plan
- Having read information note.
You may not qualify if:
- Moving in progress or predictable
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hopital Raymond Poincare
Garches, 92380, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Djamel Bensmail, MDPHD
HOPITAL RAYMOND POINCARE
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- ergotherapeute (Occupational Therapist)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2013
First Posted
October 1, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09