Effects of Early Intervention for Preterm Children at School Age
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite the remarkable achievements in neonatal survival of preterm infants with very low birth weight (VLBW, birth weight \< 1,500 g) over the past three decades, improvements have produced little change in their prevalence of severe developmental disability and the rate of low severity dysfunctions (e.g., learning disabilities, low IQ, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, specific neuropsychological deficits, poor perceptual-motor skills and internalizing behavioral problems) remains high as 50% to 70%. Few intervention programs developed for preterm infants in Western societies were shown to have short- to long-term benefits in certain cognitive functions, however, rare studies have investigated intervention effect at school age and explored plausible neurological pathway for effective intervention. This three-year study was therefore aimed to extend our previous research to longitudinally examine the effectiveness of three intervention programs (clinic-based intervention program \[CBIP\], home-based intervention program \[HBIP\] and usual care program \[UCP\]) for VLBW preterm children in Taiwan at seven years of age.(The intervention had been delivered from birth to one year of corrected age in the previous study. The intervention will not be given in this study.)The CBIP and HBIP contained similar child- and parent-focused services as well as interaction activities but were respectively delivered at the clinic for the CBIP and at home for the HBIP. A total of 178 VLBW preterm infants had been randomly assigned to the CBIP, HBIP or UCP. Sixty-two gender and maternal education level matched term children with normal birth weight had also been included to serve as the reference group for comparison of developmental outcomes. Effectiveness examined included child and parent outcomes. The long-term effect of the early intervention for preterm children would provide important information to help medical professionals and public policy makers to develop an effective intervention for Taiwanese preterm children who are at risk of developmental disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2013
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 9, 2018
April 1, 2016
2.3 years
September 18, 2013
August 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Child neurobehavioral development
Child neurobehavioral assessment including cognitive and, motor, and behavior functions. Cognitive functions were assessed by the intelligence (IQ test), the efficiency of attention control (sustained attention test), and the cognitive flexibility and planning (executive function test). Motor functions assessment included motor skill acquisition and coordination. Child's behavior was measured by the parent/teacher reported questionnaire (two different versions) of child's adaptive behavior in the school context.
at 7 years of age
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Parenting
at 7 years of age
Child health condition
at 7 years of age
Child neurophysiological functions
at 7 years of age
Child educational resources
at 7 years of age
Child growth-weight
at 7 years of age
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Usual care program
VLBW preterm infants who received usual medical care during hospitalization after birth.(in the previous study)
Clinic-based intervention program
VLBW preterm infants who received specific early intervention program delivered at clinic before 1 year of corrected age (in the previous study)
Home-based intervention program
VLBW preterm infants who received specific early intervention program delivered at home before 1 year of corrected age (in the previous study)
Term control group
Healthy term infants
Interventions
The intervention had been done in the previous intervention study. The intervention included in-hospital and after-discharge service. After-discharge intervention performed at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 months of age at the home.
The intervention had been done in the previous intervention study. The intervention included in-hospital and after-discharge service. After-discharge intervention performed at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 months of age at the clinic.
Eligibility Criteria
Term and VLBW preterm children were born at the National Taiwan University Hospital and the Mackay Memorial Hospital (MMH) and who received the intervention service in our previous intervention study will be invited to participate in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Infants exhibiting persistently unstable physiological conditions until 36 weeks' post- menstrual age (PMA) or older, being discharged from hospital at 44 weeks' PMA or older, or developing severe neonatal diseases (e.g., seizure, hydrocephalus, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, periventricular leukomalacia, grade III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis with colostomy, and stage IV-V retinopathy of prematurity) were early terminated in this study.
- Additional selection criteria for all infants in this study were as follows: mothers who read and speak Chinese, maternal age older than 18 years, absence of maternal alcohol or drug abuse history, and parents married at child's birth.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suh-Fang Jeng, Sc.D
School of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2013
First Posted
September 27, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share