NCT01951950

Brief Summary

Emergence hypertension is a common occurrence in patients emerging from general anesthesia. This elevation of arterial pressure is particularly concerning in patients undergoing craniotomy due to increased risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with altered intracranial elastance. Thus, identifying better methods to attenuate the hemodynamic changes associated with emergence from anesthesia can improve patient safety, especially in the neurosurgical patient. Study Hypothesis: Nicardipine is more effective than esmolol as a sole agent in maintaining blood pressure within goal range in the setting of emergence hypertension after craniotomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 24, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 29, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

August 29, 2014

Status Verified

August 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

September 24, 2013

Results QC Date

August 18, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 28, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Failure of Drug to Control Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) < 140 mmHg

    1 hour postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Nicardipine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects will receive a 15 mcg/kg bolus of nicardipine as needed followed by an infusion initiated at 5 mg/hr. Nicardipine may be titrated every 5 minutes, increasing 5 mg/hr and administering 15 mcg/kg bolus every minute to a maximum dose of 15 mg/hr. If systolic blood pressure (SBP) is not maintained \< 140 mmHg 5 minutes after achieving the maximum dose of nicardipine, medication "failure" will be declared and rescue drug (medication to be determined per anesthesiologist discretion) will be administered. Infusions may be titrated down if SBP decreases below 90 mmHg.

Drug: Nicardipine

Esmolol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects will receive a 0.5 mg/kg bolus of esmolol as needed followed by an infusion initiated at 50 mcg/kg/min. Esmolol may be titrated every 5 minutes, increasing 50 mcg/kg/min and administering 0.5 mg/kg bolus every minute to a maximum dose of 200 mcg/kg/min. If SBP is not maintained \< 140 mmHg 5 minutes after achieving the maximum dose of esmolol, medication "failure" will be declared and rescue drug (medication to be determined per anesthesiologist discretion) will be administered. Infusions may be titrated down if SBP decreases below 90 mmHg.

Drug: Esmolol

Interventions

Nicardipine
Esmolol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult
  • non-pregnant patients
  • (age ≥ 18 years)
  • undergoing general anesthesia for elective supratentorial, infratentorial, or transsphenoidal craniotomy

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • non-English speaking, pregnancy
  • emergent craniotomy (including trauma)
  • awake craniotomy
  • active 3 vessel coronary artery disease or left main coronary artery disease
  • advanced heart block
  • severe aortic stenosis
  • chronic renal failure
  • known or suspected allergy or intolerance to a study drug or its components

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Bekker A, Didehvar S, Kim S, Golfinos JG, Parker E, Sapson A, Haile M, Kline R, Lee M. Efficacy of clevidipine in controlling perioperative hypertension in neurosurgical patients: initial single-center experience. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010 Oct;22(4):330-5. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181e3077b.

    PMID: 20622687BACKGROUND
  • Aronson S, Dyke CM, Stierer KA, Levy JH, Cheung AT, Lumb PD, Kereiakes DJ, Newman MF. The ECLIPSE trials: comparative studies of clevidipine to nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside, and nicardipine for acute hypertension treatment in cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1110-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818240db.

    PMID: 18806012BACKGROUND
  • Kross RA, Ferri E, Leung D, Pratila M, Broad C, Veronesi M, Melendez JA. A comparative study between a calcium channel blocker (Nicardipine) and a combined alpha-beta-blocker (Labetalol) for the control of emergence hypertension during craniotomy for tumor surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):904-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00024.

    PMID: 11004045BACKGROUND
  • Bilotta F, Lam AM, Doronzio A, Cuzzone V, Delfini R, Rosa G. Esmolol blunts postoperative hemodynamic changes after propofol-remifentanil total intravenous fast-track neuroanesthesia for intracranial surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2008 Sep;20(6):426-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.04.006.

    PMID: 18929282BACKGROUND
  • Kovac AL, Masiongale A. Comparison of nicardipine versus esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic responses to anesthesia emergence and extubation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Feb;21(1):45-50. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Oct 24.

    PMID: 17289479BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Neoplasms

Interventions

Nicardipineesmolol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsNervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DihydropyridinesPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
John F. Bebawy, MD, Principal Investigator
Organization
Northwestern University

Study Officials

  • John F Bebawy, MD

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology & Neurological Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2013

First Posted

September 27, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

August 29, 2014

Results First Posted

August 29, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-08

Locations