Case Management for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a specific case management intervention for frequent users (FU) of Emergency Department (ED). Compared to infrequent or non-users, most of the ED-FU visitors are identified as vulnerable patients because they are more likely to be of low social and economical status, be more isolated and live alone. They report more chronic medical conditions, have a higher mortality rate and consume more healthcare resources. In the literature, interventions aimed at improving the management of ED-FU have demonstrated several positive outcomes, but there are still some knowledge gaps. The proposed project tests the hypotheses that case management intervention as compared with standard emergency care
- is a more efficient use of healthcare resources and reduces ED attendance,
- is cost-saving and
- improves quality of life,
- altogether leading to favorable cost-utility ratio.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedMay 27, 2015
May 1, 2015
2.1 years
August 29, 2013
May 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
number of Emergency Department visits
12 months after enrollement
Secondary Outcomes (1)
total costs of the healthcare resource
12 months after enrollement
Other Outcomes (1)
Quality of life
Day of enrollement, 2 months, 5.5 months, 9 months and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Case Management
EXPERIMENTALFurnish specific assistance and to provide referrals for the patients: * If the social determinants are not adequate, the team will lend assistance for obtaining income entitlements, health insurance coverage if eligible, stable housing, schooling for children, etc. * If there are mental disturbances, the team will refer to mental health departments inside the hospital, and if necessary, to a psychiatrist, psychologist or general practitioner (GP) out in the community. * If the patient presents risk behaviors, the team will refer to substance abuse services and links to community services in order to maintain continuity of care. * In case of somatic problems, the team will find a new GP or make contact with the previous provider, contingent on the patient's consent.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomized to control group (usual care) will receive standard emergency care by physicians (resident or attending physician) and nurses, without the case manager been involved. Nevertheless, the mobile team will take contact with each patient of the control group, giving them short information through a flyer (flyer) which will underline the existence of the mobile team, its addresses and telephone numbers.
Interventions
Furnish specific assistance and to provide referrals for the patients: * If the social determinants are not adequate, the team will lend assistance for obtaining income entitlements, health insurance coverage if eligible, stable housing, schooling for children, etc. * If there are mental disturbances, the team will refer to mental health departments inside the hospital, and if necessary, to a psychiatrist, psychologist or general practitioner (GP) out in the community. * If the patient presents risk behaviors, the team will refer to substance abuse services and links to community services in order to maintain continuity of care. * In case of somatic problems, the team will find a new GP or make contact with the previous provider, contingent on the patient's consent.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- or more attendances during the previous 12 months at the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Lausanne
- Be capable of communicating in any of the languages spoken by the team (i.e. French, English, German, Italian and Spanish) or through a community interpreter
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who cannot give informed consent or are ineligible to receive Case Managers services (e.g. acutely confused, acutely psychotic, intoxicated)
- Patients who are in prison
- Patients with a diagnose of cognitive disorders (delirium, dementia, and other cognitive disorders)
- Patients who are not expected to survive at least 18 months after enrollment
- Patients who will not remain in Switzerland for 12 to 18 months after enrollment
- Family members of a participant already included
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Lausanne
Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
Related Publications (6)
Althaus F, Paroz S, Hugli O, Ghali WA, Daeppen JB, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Bodenmann P. Effectiveness of interventions targeting frequent users of emergency departments: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):41-52.e42. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.007.
PMID: 21689565BACKGROUNDBieler G, Paroz S, Faouzi M, Trueb L, Vaucher P, Althaus F, Daeppen JB, Bodenmann P. Social and medical vulnerability factors of emergency department frequent users in a universal health insurance system. Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01246.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
PMID: 22221292BACKGROUNDAlthaus F, Stucki S, Guyot S, Trueb L, Moschetti K, Daeppen JB, Bodenmann P. Characteristics of highly frequent users of a Swiss academic emergency department: a retrospective consecutive case series. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;20(6):413-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835e078e.
PMID: 23337095BACKGROUNDShumway M, Boccellari A, O'Brien K, Okin RL. Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;26(2):155-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.021.
PMID: 18272094BACKGROUNDIglesias K, Baggio S, Moschetti K, Wasserfallen JB, Hugli O, Daeppen JB, Burnand B, Bodenmann P. Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial. Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):503-513. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1739-6. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
PMID: 29188481DERIVEDBodenmann P, Velonaki VS, Ruggeri O, Hugli O, Burnand B, Wasserfallen JB, Moschetti K, Iglesias K, Baggio S, Daeppen JB. Case management for frequent users of the emergency department: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 17;14:264. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-264.
PMID: 24938769DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bodenmann Patrick, PD, MER, MSc
University of Lausanne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PD, MER, MSc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2013
First Posted
September 4, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05