Proactive Diabetes Case Management
1 other identifier
interventional
260
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite a growing array of therapeutic options and efficacious treatment strategies to prevent or delay some of the most severe complications of type 2 diabetes, there continue to be many individuals with outcomes that are far from optimal. Interventions to improve diabetes care by educating providers and patients have been disappointing. In the past several years, case management has been widely advocated as a cost-effective approach to coordinate diabetes care and improve outcomes, although there is little rigorous evidence demonstrating the benefits of this type of intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2001
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2002
CompletedApril 7, 2015
February 1, 2007
March 14, 2001
April 6, 2015
Conditions
Study Arms (1)
Arm 1
OTHERInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients were eligible to participate in the study if their most current hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was \>=8.5 (reported within the last year); they had at least 1 prescription for an oral hypoglycemic agent, insulin, or monitoring supplies filled in the last year; and, they had an outpatient visit scheduled with a general internist, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant between May, 1999 and January, 2000.
- Patients were not eligible for the study if the patient (or another member of the household when applicable) indicated that they: (1) were under 18 years of age; (2) had never been diagnosed with diabetes; (3) had been diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes or had been diagnosed before age 30; (4) did not have a telephone; (5) did not speak English; (6) were not competent for interview; (7) did not receive their primary diabetes care within the VA system; (8) were currently receiving treatment for cancer (other than non-melanoma); (9) had been diagnosed with kidney failure, congestive heart failure (and were short of breath at rest), liver disease, or blindness; (10) changed residences during certain months of the year; (11) planned to move in the near future; or their HbA1c obtained at baseline was \< 7.5%.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States
Related Publications (3)
Krein SL, Vijan S, Choe HM, Hayward RA. Quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2680; author reply 2681. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2680-a. No abstract available.
PMID: 17164452RESULTKrein SL, Hofer TP, Kerr EA, Hayward RA. Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities. Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1159-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01102.
PMID: 12479491RESULTKrein SL, Klamerus ML, Vijan S, Lee JL, Fitzgerald JT, Pawlow A, Reeves P, Hayward RA. Case management for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized trial. Am J Med. 2004 Jun 1;116(11):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.028.
PMID: 15144909RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah L. Krein, PhD RN
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alan J. Pawlow, MD
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rodney A. Hayward, MD
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2001
First Posted
March 16, 2001
Study Completion
August 1, 2002
Last Updated
April 7, 2015
Record last verified: 2007-02