NCT00013208

Brief Summary

Despite a growing array of therapeutic options and efficacious treatment strategies to prevent or delay some of the most severe complications of type 2 diabetes, there continue to be many individuals with outcomes that are far from optimal. Interventions to improve diabetes care by educating providers and patients have been disappointing. In the past several years, case management has been widely advocated as a cost-effective approach to coordinate diabetes care and improve outcomes, although there is little rigorous evidence demonstrating the benefits of this type of intervention.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
260

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 14, 2001

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2001

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2002

Completed
Last Updated

April 7, 2015

Status Verified

February 1, 2007

First QC Date

March 14, 2001

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2015

Conditions

Study Arms (1)

Arm 1

OTHER
Behavioral: Case Management

Interventions

Case ManagementBEHAVIORAL
Arm 1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients were eligible to participate in the study if their most current hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was \>=8.5 (reported within the last year); they had at least 1 prescription for an oral hypoglycemic agent, insulin, or monitoring supplies filled in the last year; and, they had an outpatient visit scheduled with a general internist, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant between May, 1999 and January, 2000.
  • Patients were not eligible for the study if the patient (or another member of the household when applicable) indicated that they: (1) were under 18 years of age; (2) had never been diagnosed with diabetes; (3) had been diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes or had been diagnosed before age 30; (4) did not have a telephone; (5) did not speak English; (6) were not competent for interview; (7) did not receive their primary diabetes care within the VA system; (8) were currently receiving treatment for cancer (other than non-melanoma); (9) had been diagnosed with kidney failure, congestive heart failure (and were short of breath at rest), liver disease, or blindness; (10) changed residences during certain months of the year; (11) planned to move in the near future; or their HbA1c obtained at baseline was \< 7.5%.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Krein SL, Vijan S, Choe HM, Hayward RA. Quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2680; author reply 2681. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2680-a. No abstract available.

  • Krein SL, Hofer TP, Kerr EA, Hayward RA. Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities. Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1159-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01102.

  • Krein SL, Klamerus ML, Vijan S, Lee JL, Fitzgerald JT, Pawlow A, Reeves P, Hayward RA. Case management for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized trial. Am J Med. 2004 Jun 1;116(11):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.028.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Interventions

Case Management

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient Care PlanningComprehensive Health CarePatient Care ManagementHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Sarah L. Krein, PhD RN

    VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Alan J. Pawlow, MD

    John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Rodney A. Hayward, MD

    VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2001

First Posted

March 16, 2001

Study Completion

August 1, 2002

Last Updated

April 7, 2015

Record last verified: 2007-02

Locations