Study Stopped
inadequate data
CSF Leak Following Microvascular Decompression: the Benefit of Routine Postoperative Lumbar Tap
1 other identifier
observational
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Even at centers with very large experience, the risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage in surgery for microvascular decompression is reported up to 3%. Prevention of leakage is important since meningitis may follow. Also, leakage usually means longer hospital stay and increased cost. In case of detected leakage extra sutures may be applied, placement of a lumbar drain may be considered or a revision and improved closure may be attempted. With leakage in the subcutaneous tissue, but not through the skin, a local accumulation causing local symptoms may also occur. In addition to being burdensome and being associated with longer hospital stays with possible revision surgery, such complications are also very costly. The best way to reduce cost and burden, and to improve patient care, is to prevent CSF leakage. The aim of this study is to determine if prophylactic lumbar tap is beneficial for prevention of cerebrospinal fluid leakage following microvascular decompression, by comparison of surgical approaches in 3 geographical areas in the Scandinavian health system. Hypothesis: There is no difference in cerebrospinal fluid leakage between the group subject to prophylactic spinal tap versus the group without prophylactic spinal tap.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedMay 13, 2015
May 1, 2015
9 months
August 27, 2013
May 12, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
cerebrospinal fluid leakage
Any leakage after 3rd postoperative day (since one hospital introduces iatrogenic leakage the first 3 days after surgery)
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
overall complication risk
30 days
Specific complication risk
30 days
days in hospital
30 days
Study Arms (2)
prophylactic spinal tap
Microvascular decompression surgery approach at the Karolinska University Hospital, i.e. a small craniectomy (removal of bone without putting it back), and postoperatively serial prophylactic lumbar tap
no prophylactic spinal tap
Microvascular decompression surgery approach at St Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital and the University Hospital of North Norway, i.e. not comprising a policy of preventing CSF leak by performing prophylactic lumbar taps or its equivalents
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
The planned study is a retrospective review of medical charts in consecutive patients undergoing surgery for neurovascular conflict by microvascular decompression surgery. Patients will be identified from the operating protocols at the respective hospitals.
You may qualify if:
- microvascular decompression surgery for neurovascular conflict (hemifacial spasm, trigeminal neuralgia)
- surgery between 1990 and 2013
- Follow-up visit registered in medical charts \> 30 days postoperatively (at either local hospital, treating neurologist or at neurosurgical clinic)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Olavs Hospitallead
- Norwegian University of Science and Technologycollaborator
- Karolinska University Hospitalcollaborator
- University Hospital of North Norwaycollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Asgeir S Jakola, MD PhD
St. Olavs Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2013
First Posted
August 30, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 13, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05