Pulsed Radiofrequency in Trigeminal Neuralgia
Pulsed Radiofrequency in Treatment of Classic Trigeminal Neuralgia (Prolonged Duration Versus Higher Voltage)
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The current study investigated the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in pain reduction in TN patients and compared the efficacy and the impact on the quality of life of the standard technique with a prolonged duration technique and a higher voltage one. Entire enrolled patients were diagnosed as classic TN according to the international headache society classification (IHS, 2013) and underwent brain MRI and MRA to exclude secondary causes. Patients were randomly divided into three groups, Group A patients underwent PRF using the standard settings, group B patients underwent PRF with prolonged duration and Group C patients underwent PRF with higher voltage. VAS and pain amplitude reduction were recorded before the intervention and 1 hour, 1 day, 1week, 1 month, 6 months and 1year after it. Quality of life was assessed before and 1 year after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2020
CompletedApril 21, 2020
April 1, 2020
3 years
December 1, 2019
April 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain amplitude reduction
compare the pain amplitude reduction in the three groups using the visual analogue pain scale
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
RAND 36-Item Health Survey
1 year
Study Arms (3)
Group A
ACTIVE COMPARATORusing the standard settings of pulsed radiofrequency technique (PRFT). two cycles, each one for 2 minutes at 45 Volts (V) with a pulse width of 10 milliseconds (ms) and a pulse frequency of 4 Hertz (Hz). The cut-off needle tip temperature is set at 420 Celsius (C).
Group B
EXPERIMENTALusing prolonged duration of PRFT. four cycles, each one for 2 minutes at 45V with a pulse width of 10ms and a pulse frequency of 4Hz. The cut-off needle tip temperature is set at 420C.
Group C
EXPERIMENTALusing higher voltage PRFT.. two cycles, each one for 2 minutes at 60V with a pulse width of 10ms and a pulse frequency of 4Hz. The cut-off needle tip temperature is set at 420C.
Interventions
Pulsed radiofrequency of the trigeminal nerve using NeuroTherm NT 1100 RF generator device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients are diagnosed as classic TN according to the international headache society classification of headache disorders
- Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain of at least 4 or more.
- Pain is refractory to medical treatment (for at least 3 months with three drugs including carbamazepine with optimum dosage) or patients who developed intolerable side effects from medications.
You may not qualify if:
- Symptomatic (secondary) TN: which is causes by structural lesion other than neurovascular compression such as multiple sclerosis, tumors, stroke or trauma according to the international headache society classification (IHS, 2013).
- Local infection at the site of the needle puncture. Bleeding tendency or coagulopathy. Previous treatment with invasive treatments such as radiofrequency thermo coagulation, destructive chemical injection, gamma knife treatment, percutaneous balloon micro-compression or microvascular decompression.
- Major mental or psychiatric disorders. History of drug abuse.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2019
First Posted
April 21, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04