Treatment Schistosomal Portal Hypertension: Efficacy of Endoscopy or Surgery
Treatment of Schistosomal Portal Hypertension: Assessment of Efficacy of Endoscopic Therapy Alone or in the Combined With Surgical Procedure
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension secondary to schistosomiasis mansoni. Taking into account the endemic nature of schistosomiasis mansoni in our region and the high morbidity and mortality directly associated with rupture of esophageal varices and UGIB in affected patients, we conducted a prospective randomized trial in patients with schistosomiasis and a history of bleeding esophageal varices. Its purpose was to assess the efficacy of endoscopic treatment alone compared with the efficacy of sclerotherapy preceded by a surgical treatment: Esophagogastric devascularization with splenectomy (EGDS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2013
CompletedAugust 29, 2013
August 1, 2013
2.2 years
March 15, 2013
August 26, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sucess of treatment evaluated clinically by the absence of UGIB in the two years o follow-up.
Its purpose was to assess the efficacy of endoscopic treatment alone compared with the efficacy of sclerotherapy preceded by EGDS.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Endoscopic evaluation of presence and grade of esophageal varices were made in both groups during the follow-up.
24 months
Other Outcomes (1)
No other outcomes were evaluated.
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Endoscopic treatment alone
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3 to 5 sessions of sclerotherapy till eradication of esophageal varices.
Total EGDS + endoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATOREsophagogastric devascularization with splenectomy followed by endoscopic sclerotherapy of esophageal varices 2 months postoperatively.
Interventions
The presence of gastroesophageal varices was confirmed by fiberoptic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). In view of the experience of our service and local circumstances at the time of the study, the endoscopic treatment of choice was sclerotherapy, performed with a Teflon-sheathed metal needle. The sclerosing agent was 2.5% monoethanolamine oleate. Esophageal varices visible on EGD in the pre- and post-treatment period were classified as small, medium or large on the basis of criteria proposed by Paquet. All complications attributable to sclerotherapy were recorded.
Esophagogastric devascularization with splenectomy followed by endoscopic sclerotherapy of esophageal varices 2 months postoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 15 and 65 years;
- an established diagnosis of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis as the cause of portal hypertension;
- a history of UGIB secondary to rupture of esophageal varices, with at least 20 days having elapsed since the most recent episode of bleeding.
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic alcoholism, defined as an alcohol intake of ≥60 g/EtOH/day in men and ≥40 g/EtOH/day in women;
- presence of fundal varices on endoscopy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidade Federal de Alagoas
Maceió, Alagoas, 57000000, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Celina Lacet, Doctor
Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2013
First Posted
August 29, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2003
Primary Completion
March 1, 2005
Study Completion
March 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 29, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08