Using "PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST)" in Evaluating Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherpy for Esophageal Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the initial staging, therapy planning, and therapeutic response monitoring for esophageal cancer patients. Purpose:
- 1.The incremental staging information by using 18F-FDG PET
- 2.The impact of the PET results on the patients' subsequent therapy planning
- 3.To compare treatment response using RECIST criteria and FDG PET results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedApril 15, 2014
April 1, 2014
1.8 years
August 15, 2013
April 13, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the initial staging, therapy planning, and therapeutic response monitoring for esophageal cancer patients.
2 hours
Study Arms (1)
esophageal cancer, 18F-FDG PET
Eligibility Criteria
Histological proved esophageal cancer
You may qualify if:
- Age:20-90 years old
- Histological proved esophageal cancer
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- written informed consent signed
You may not qualify if:
- prior chemotherapy or treatment for other systemic anti-cancer agent(s)
- pregnant or intend to be pregnant
- other malignancies known
- other concurrent cancer treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan, 100, Taiwan
Related Publications (6)
Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2241-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035010. No abstract available.
PMID: 14657432BACKGROUNDNg T, Vezeridis MP. Advances in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun 15;101(8):725-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.21566.
PMID: 20512949BACKGROUNDChatterton BE, Ho Shon I, Baldey A, Lenzo N, Patrikeos A, Kelley B, Wong D, Ramshaw JE, Scott AM. Positron emission tomography changes management and prognostic stratification in patients with oesophageal cancer: results of a multicentre prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Mar;36(3):354-61. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0959-y. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
PMID: 18931839BACKGROUNDYen TJ, Chung CS, Wu YW, Yen RF, Cheng MF, Lee JM, Hsu CH, Chang YL, Wang HP. Comparative study between endoscopic ultrasonography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in staging patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Jan;25(1):40-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01204.x. Epub 2011 May 19.
PMID: 21595776BACKGROUNDBarber TW, Duong CP, Leong T, Bressel M, Drummond EG, Hicks RJ. 18F-FDG PET/CT has a high impact on patient management and provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of esophageal cancer: a prospective study with mature survival data. J Nucl Med. 2012 Jun;53(6):864-71. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101568. Epub 2012 May 11.
PMID: 22582047BACKGROUNDYanagawa M, Tatsumi M, Miyata H, Morii E, Tomiyama N, Watabe T, Isohashi K, Kato H, Shimosegawa E, Yamasaki M, Mori M, Doki Y, Hatazawa J. Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2012 Jun;53(6):872-80. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.098699. Epub 2012 May 11.
PMID: 22582049BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yen Ruoh Fang, M.D.,Ph.D.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2013
First Posted
August 23, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 15, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04