NCT01925404

Brief Summary

Encouraging greater levels of physical activity is critical to improving health among Americans, who are largely sedentary. Neighborhood parks are resources for physical activity that are available to most Americans within a couple miles of their homes, yet many residents are unaware of the programs and facilities available. Previous research indicates that park use is related to park programming and outreach. Because funding for parks is limited, low-cost interventions are needed to attract more people to parks to engage in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. While many community-based organizations would like to invest in efforts that increase physical activity, few low-cost park programs are documented to be both scalable and cost-effective. Effective programs that can be replicated to make population-level impacts are needed. The goal of this study is to develop and test 2 low-cost community-level approaches, free exercise classes vs. a frequent user program, to promoting physical activity, singly and in combination, in 48 park settings in Los Angeles low-income neighborhoods.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2013

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2017

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 19, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

August 15, 2013

Results QC Date

December 15, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Physical activityparksprogrammingpublic health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage Change in Park-based Physical Activity

    Physical activity was measured in MET-hours (Metabolic equivalents)

    difference between baseline and follow-up (1 year)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Park Use (% Change)

    baseline versus 1 year

Study Arms (4)

Frequent User Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Park users will be able to earn rewards or prizes by coming more frequently to the park

Behavioral: Frequent User

Free Physical Activity Classes/programs

EXPERIMENTAL

We will offer at least 100 free physical activity classes at the park

Behavioral: Free physical activity classes

Combined arm

EXPERIMENTAL

We will offer free classes and the frequent user program at the park

Behavioral: Free physical activity classesBehavioral: Frequent User

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Business as usual, no special physical activity programs offered

Interventions

100 hours of free activity classes will be provided

Combined armFree Physical Activity Classes/programs
Frequent UserBEHAVIORAL

Participants can become eligible for prizes by visiting the park more frequently

Combined armFrequent User Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

RAND

Santa Monica, California, 90407, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Derose KP, Han B, Park S, Williamson S, Cohen DA. The mediating role of perceived crime in gender and built environment associations with park use and park-based physical activity among park users in high poverty neighborhoods. Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129:105846. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105846. Epub 2019 Sep 10.

  • Cohen DA, Han B, Park S, Williamson S, Derose KP. Park Use and Park-Based Physical Activity in Low-Income Neighborhoods. J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Jun 1;27(3):334-342. doi: 10.1123/japa.2018-0032. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

  • Han B, Cohen DA, Derose KP, Li J, Williamson S. Violent Crime and Park Use in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods. Am J Prev Med. 2018 Mar;54(3):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.025. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

  • Derose KP, Han B, Williamson S, Cohen DA. Gender Disparities in Park Use and Physical Activity among Residents of High-Poverty Neighborhoods in Los Angeles. Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Limitations and Caveats

Park observations were snapshot direct observations of aggregated activities. Resident surveys were based on self-reports, subject to reporting biases. The resident sample was a repeated-cross sectional sample rather than a longitudinal cohort.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Deborah Cohen
Organization
RAND

Study Officials

  • Deborah A Cohen, MD, MPH

    RAND

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2013

First Posted

August 19, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

July 1, 2017

Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Results First Posted

June 19, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

May be available upon request as appropriate. We have response data from park users and residents living within one mile of enrolled parks. Interested researchers should contact the PI

Locations