Comparison of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Technique
Comparison of EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration Technique: Negative-pressure Suction With Syringe vs. Capillary Sampling With Stylet Slow-pull Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a safe and effective method for diagnosing pancreatic and peripancreatic solid masses. The aim of this study is to compare the two aspiration methods in EUS-FNA: negative-pressure suction with syringe vs. capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique. We will evaluate the diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of the specimens obtained by EUS-FNA with two aspiration methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedAugust 16, 2013
August 1, 2013
1 year
August 12, 2013
August 15, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of true positive or true negative results in pathology
Compare the two groups (NPS vs. CSS) with the pathologic accuracy (rate of true positive or true negative) by EUS-FNA.
The pathologic results will be reported within 7 days after EUS-FNA.
Study Arms (2)
Negative-pressure syringe
ACTIVE COMPARATOREUS-FNA with negative-pressure suction with syringe
Capillary sampling with slow-pull
EXPERIMENTALEUS-FNA with capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique
Interventions
EUS-guided fine needle aspiration will be performed by a single experienced endoscopist (D.H.P) using a conventional linear array echoendoscope (GF-UCT240, Olympus Optical Tokyo, Japan) under conscious sedation with midazolam and meperidine. After the optimal puncture site was determined, a puncture will be done using a 22-gauge EchoTip needle (Cook Endoscopy, Winston-Salem, NC) guided by real-time EUS imaging. Subsequently, the stylet will be slowly removed as the needle is moved to-and-fro for 15 times (capillary sampling method with stylet slow-pull technique) or negative-pressure 10 mL syringe will be applied (negative-pressure syringe suction). A total of 4 needle passes will be done for the lesion with using above two aspiration methods alternatively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients with pancreatic solid mass which requires EUS-FNA for diagnosis
- Informed consent is obtained
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 20 years
- Active gastrointestinal bleeding
- Bleeding tendency (platelet \< 50,000/mm3 and/or PT INR \> 1.5)
- Unable to understand and/or read the informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Do Hyun Park, MD, PhD
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2013
First Posted
August 16, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 16, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08