Prospective Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy (EUS-FNAB) in the Absence of Rapid Onsite Evaluation
FNASROSE
Prospective Evaluation of the Yield and Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy in the Absence of Rapid Onsite Evaluation
1 other identifier
observational
75
1 country
2
Brief Summary
\<Background/aims\> Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy (EUS-FNAB) specimens by attending cytopathologists has been demonstrated to improve diagnostic yields of EUS-FNAB. The practice of ROSE, however, varies across EUS programs in Unites States, Europe and other areas of world. The investigators have a plan to perform prospective evaluation of the yield of EUS-FNAB in the absence of ROSE, in which the adequacy of specimens will be assessed by a single endosonographer. \<Methods\> All EUS-FNAB procedures will be performed by an experienced endosonographer and the adequacy of specimens obtained during EUS-FNAB will be also assessed by a same endosonographer. A specimen will be considered adequate if there is an adequate number of representative cells from the lesion. Samples considered to be adequate will be then interpreted as malignancy, highly atypical suggestive of malignancy, atypical favor reactive change, or negative for malignancy. Performance characteristics of EUS-FNAB including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy will be determined by comparing EUS-FNAB results with the final diagnoses of the lesions, based upon the surgical pathology or clinical follow-up of more than 6 months with repeat imagings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2014
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 24, 2016
February 1, 2016
1.4 years
March 2, 2014
February 22, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS-FNA without ROSE
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of EUS-FNA without ROSE
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Adequacy of obtained cytologic specimens
7 days
Study Arms (1)
EUS-FNA
Any patients who will undergo EUS-FNA for pancreas lesion during the study period
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Any patients who will undergo EUS-FNA for the diagnostic evaluation of pancreas lesion
You may qualify if:
- Any patients who will undergo EUS-FNA for the diagnostic evaluation of pancreas lesion
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to undergo EUS-FNA
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Sungkyunkwan University Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Seoul, 110-746, South Korea
Sungkyunkwan University Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Seoul, 110746, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2014
First Posted
March 5, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02