Rehabilitation of Executive Functioning in Veterans With PTSD and Mild TBI
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
2
Brief Summary
One of the most pressing concerns within the VA currently is the provision of interventions that address the cognitive as well as emotional problems faced by Veterans with concurrent mild TBI and PTSD. One purpose of this study is to learn more about how PTSD and mild brain injury influences how people think, act, and feel. This may include how people pay attention, keep information in memory, organize plans for achieving important goals, and manage stress. Another purpose of this research is to learn more about the effects of cognitive training on the thinking, behavior, and emotions of individuals with PTSD and mild brain injury - both in the short- and long-term. With this research, the investigators hope to better understand and treat cognitive and emotional difficulties that can occur due to PTSD and mild brain injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 31, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 17, 2020
CompletedFebruary 17, 2020
February 1, 2020
5.4 years
August 2, 2013
January 17, 2020
February 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Performance on Neurocognitive Measure of Attention and Executive Function Post GOALS Intervention vs EDU Control Training
Attention and Executive Function Overall Domain Z Score (primary neuropsychological outcome measure) is calculated as the average of z scores of following tests: Letter Number Sequencing, Auditory Consonant Trigrams, Digit Vigilance, Trails B, DKEFS Stroop Inhibition, DKEFS Stroop Inhibition-Switching, DKEFS Verbal Fluency Switching, DKEFS Visual Fluency Switching. (The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the population mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the reference population and positive numbers indicate values higher than the reference population)
baseline, 5 weeks
Long Term Follow-up After GOALS Training - Change in Performance on Neurocognitive Measures of Attention and Executive Function 6+ Months Post GOALS Intervention Relative to Baseline
Attention and Executive Function Overall Domain Z Score (primary neuropsychological outcome measure) is calculated as the average of z scores of following tests: Letter Number Sequencing, Auditory Consonant Trigrams, Digit Vigilance, Trails B, DKEFS Stroop Inhibition, DKEFS Stroop Inhibition-Switching, DKEFS Verbal Fluency Switching, DKEFS Visual Fluency Switching. (The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the population mean. Negative numbers indicate values lower than the reference population and positive numbers indicate values higher than the reference population)
baseline, 6+ months after GOALS training
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Performance on Complex Functional Task -Goal Processing Scale Post GOALS Intervention vs EDU Control Training
baseline; 5 weeks
Long Term Follow-up After GOALS Training - Change in Performance on Complex Functional Task -Goal Processing Scale 6+ Months Post GOALS Intervention Relative to Baseline
baseline, 6 months post GOALS training
Change on Self Report Measures of Emotional Regulation GOALS Post Intervention vs EDU Control Training
baseline, 5 weeks
Long Term Follow-up Change on Self Report Measures of Emotional Regulation 6+ Months Post GOALS Intervention
baseline, 6 months
Study Arms (2)
GOALS (Goal-Oriented Attentional Regulation)
EXPERIMENTALGoal-Oriented Attentional Regulation (GOALS) will involve 5-weeks of training (20 hours of group training (2 hour sessions, 2 days per week), 3 hours of individual training (1 hour at the beginning, halfway through and at the end of training), and approximately 20 hours of home practice). Some subjects will only receive the GOALS intervention.
EDU (Brain Health Education)
ACTIVE COMPARATORBrain Health Education (EDU) will involve 5-weeks of training (20 hours of group training (2 hour sessions, 2 days per week), 3 hours of individual training (1 hour at the beginning, halfway through and at the end of training), and approximately 20 hours of homework). The EDU intervention involves education on brain health and functioning in a classroom format, with study materials for homework. Some subjects will start with EDU and then cross-over to the GOALS.
Interventions
Goal-Oriented Attentional Regulation (GOALS) will involve 5-weeks of training (20 hours of group training (2 hour sessions, 2 days per week), 3 hours of individual training (1 hour at the beginning, halfway through and at the end of training), and approximately 20 hours of home practice). Some subjects will only receive the GOALS intervention.
Brain Health Education (EDU) will involve 5-weeks of training (20 hours of group training (2 hour sessions, 2 days per week), 3 hours of individual training (1 hour at the beginning, halfway through and at the end of training), and approximately 20 hours of homework). The EDU intervention involves education on brain health and functioning in a classroom format, with study materials for homework. Some subjects will start with EDU and then cross-over to the GOALS.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of PTSD
- History of mild TBI, including concussion \> 6 months ago
- Cognitive difficulties affecting daily functioning
- Age 18-75
- Veteran
- At least 12th grade education or equivalent
You may not qualify if:
- Amnesic/Severe memory problems
- Active Substance Abuse/Dependence
- Medical condition that may affect mental status/disrupt study participation
- Active psychotropic medication changes
- Participation in evidence-based PTSD treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Martinez Outpatient Clinic and Community Living Center, Martinez, CA
Martinez, California, 94553, United States
San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, California, 94121, United States
Related Publications (4)
Novakovic-Agopian T, Chen AJ, Rome S, Abrams G, Castelli H, Rossi A, McKim R, Hills N, D'Esposito M. Rehabilitation of executive functioning with training in attention regulation applied to individually defined goals: a pilot study bridging theory, assessment, and treatment. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):325-38. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181f1ead2.
PMID: 21169860RESULTChen AJ, Novakovic-Agopian T, Nycum TJ, Song S, Turner GR, Hills NK, Rome S, Abrams GM, D'Esposito M. Training of goal-directed attention regulation enhances control over neural processing for individuals with brain injury. Brain. 2011 May;134(Pt 5):1541-54. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr067. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
PMID: 21515904RESULTNovakovic-Agopian T, Chen AJ, Rome S, Rossi A, Abrams G, D'Esposito M, Turner G, McKim R, Muir J, Hills N, Kennedy C, Garfinkle J, Murphy M, Binder D, Castelli H. Assessment of subcomponents of executive functioning in ecologically valid settings: the goal processing scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):136-46. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182691b15.
PMID: 23076096RESULTNovakovic-Agopian T, Kornblith E, Abrams G, Burciaga-Rosales J, Loya F, D'Esposito M, Chen AJW. Training in Goal-Oriented Attention Self-Regulation Improves Executive Functioning in Veterans with Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Dec 1;35(23):2784-2795. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5529. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
PMID: 29717652RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
One important limitation of this study is a relatively small sample size, which may have also resulted in our interaction analyses being under powered, possibly leading to failure to detect true effects of group on outcomes
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Tatjana Novakovic-Agopian
- Organization
- San Francisco VA HCS
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tatjana Novakovic-Agopian, PhD
San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2013
First Posted
August 13, 2013
Study Start
July 31, 2013
Primary Completion
December 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 17, 2020
Results First Posted
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Following study completion and publication of results we will explore available mechanisms for data sharing