Cortisol Suppression and Startle Responses in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
CSS
Effects of Cortisol Suppression on Fear-Potentiated Startle in Traumatized Individuals With and Without PTSD
2 other identifiers
interventional
165
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs in some people after exposure to events that cause extreme fear or helplessness. The incidence of war zones worldwide and the prevalence of violence in large cities in the U.S., increases the likelihood that people will experience a traumatizing event in their lifetime. About 1 in 10 people who survive such events will develop PTSD, while most people will get better over time. This suggests that some people may have biological vulnerabilities that make it harder for them to recover. One of these biological risk factors may be related to how stress hormones work in people who get sick. Another is how people react to things that make them afraid or nervous, investigators have found that PTSD patients have higher than normal fear reactions. The part of the brain that reacts to fearful stimulation is linked to stress hormones; the purpose of this study is to examine how these systems interact. The study will suppress stress hormones (cortisol) production in one group of participants, while another will get a placebo. When their cortisol is suppressed, the participants will undergo a startle study to see if their fear responses are decreased. Investigators expect that people PTSD will show a normal fear response when their cortisol levels are reduced, similar to people without PTSD. This research can help discover new medicines for people with PTSD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 23, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 18, 2017
CompletedApril 18, 2017
March 1, 2017
3.7 years
November 17, 2011
August 25, 2016
March 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Mean Baseline Startle Magnitude During Fear Conditioning
The study measured the acoustic startle response magnitude to a sudden noise using electromyography of the eyeblink muscle. This response magnitude was used as the individual's baseline to compare to the startle magnitude to the danger signal to see if fear conditioning had occurred.
10 hours after drug administration
Mean Startle Magnitude to Danger Signal During Fear Conditioning
The acoustic startle response magnitude was measured using electromyography recordings of the eyeblink muscle when a sudden tone was delivered through headphones in the presence of a stimulus that was paired with an aversive outcome (i.e. the danger signal). If an individual showed successful fear learning, then startle to the danger signal would be greater than baseline startle.
10 hours after drug administration
Mean Fear-potentiated Startle to Danger Signal During Early Extinction
Fear-potentiated startle was measured as a difference score between the startle to danger signal and the baseline. This difference score reflects the degree of fear response at the beginning of extinction.
10 hours after drug administration
Mean Fear-potentiated Startle to Danger Signal During Late Extinction
This measures the level of fear-potentiated startle (the difference between startle magnitude to the danger signal and baseline startle magnitude) at the end of extinction. Because the danger signal is no longer paired with the aversive stimulus like it was during the conditioning phase, the fear response should decrease from early to late extinction in individuals who show intact extinction learning.
10 hours after drug administration
Study Arms (2)
PTSD Negative
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants who do not have PTSD will receive placebo and dexamethasone in random order for the duration of two consecutive study visits separated by at least one month.
PTSD Positive
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with PTSD will receive placebo and dexamethasone in random order for the duration of two consecutive study visits separated by at least one month.
Interventions
One tablet of 0.5 mg dexamethasone will be taken ten hours prior to completing study assessments.
One placebo tablet will be taken ten hours prior to completing study assessments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to give informed consent
- Willing to participate in initial assessment and 2 full days of interviews and imaging visit
- Able to understand English and no obvious deficit in comprehension or following directions
- years old
You may not qualify if:
- Mental Retardation (per clinical judgment of study physician)
- Psychotic Disorder (per clinical judgment of study physician)
- Acute suicidal ideation
- Pregnancy
- Positive urine drug screen
- Active medical disorders contributing to psychiatric sx e.g. hypo or hyperthyroidism, SLE, advanced cirrhosis, etc. (per clinical judgment of study physician)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Grady Health System
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303, United States
Related Publications (1)
Jovanovic T, Phifer JE, Sicking K, Weiss T, Norrholm SD, Bradley B, Ressler KJ. Cortisol suppression by dexamethasone reduces exaggerated fear responses in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Nov;36(10):1540-52. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 May 20.
PMID: 21601366BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Tanja Jovanovic
- Organization
- Emory University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tanja Jovanovic, PhD
Emory University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2011
First Posted
November 23, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 18, 2017
Results First Posted
April 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03