Safety and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Patients With Gain-of-function Nav1.7 Mutations Related Small Fiber Neuropathy
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Patients With Gain-of-function Nav1.7 Mutations Related Small Fiber Neuropathy: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Crossover Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lacosamide is a functionalized amino acid with antinociceptive properties in inflammatory and neuropathic pain, and displays a unique mechanism: it enhances slow inactivation of Nav1.3, Nav1.7, and Nav1.8. Nav1.7 is expressed predominantly in nociceptive and sympathetic neurons. Gain-of-function mutations have been described in Nav1.7 that result in extreme pain disorders such as SCN9A-associated small fiber neuropathy. In the disease states genetically linked to a gain-of-function of Nav1.7, the sodium channel is mutated to increase the sodium influx resulting in a hyperexcitable sensory neuron, and a resultant sensation of pain. The objective of the study is to determine the efficacy and safety of lacosamide, a sodium channel blocker, in patients with pain due to SCN9A-associated small fiber neuropathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 10, 2018
January 1, 2018
2.7 years
July 13, 2013
January 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale
mean daily pain intensity is assesed twice a day, during a period of 33 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Daily Sleep Interference Scale
Daily sleep interference will be assesed once daily, during a period of 33 weeks
• Adverse Events, Laboratory Safety Tests (Hematology, Clinical Chemistry, Urinalysis), Blood Pressure, Pulse Rate, ECG.
At start of the study and 5 times during 33 weeks
Small Fiber Neuropathy Symptoms Inventory Questionnaire (SFN-SIQ).
SFN-SIQ will be assesed 13 times during 33 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC).
Global impression of change will be assesed 12 times during 33 weeks
Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS).
Neuropathic pain will be assesed 13 times during 33 weeks.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients with gain-of-function Nav 1.7 related small fiber neuropathy in this arm will receive placebo.
Lacosamide
EXPERIMENTALPatients with gain-of-function Nav 1.7 related small fiber neuropathy in this arm will receive lacosamide.
Interventions
comparison between lacosamide 200mg twice daily and microcrystalline cellulose (placebo) 200mg twice daily.
comparison between microcrystalline cellulose (placebo) 200mg twice daily and lacosamide 200mg twice daily.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and/or female subjects between the ages of 18 and 80 years.
- Presence of a clinical diagnosis of Small Fiber Neuropathy (SFN), with at least 2 of the following clinical symptoms:
- Burning feet.
- Allodynia.
- Diminished pain and/or temperature sensation.
- Dry eyes or mouth.
- Orthostatic dizziness.
- Bowel disturbances (constipation, diarrhea, gastroparesis).
- Urinary disturbances.
- Sweat changes (hyper-/hypohidrosis).
- Visual accommodation problems and/or blurred vision.
- Hot flashes/palpitations.
- Impotence, diminished ejaculation or lubrication.
- In addition to the clinical diagnosis of SFN, presence of confirmed abnormality on intra-epidermal nerve fiber density evaluation (IENFD) and/or Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) and a mutation in the SCN9A gene, confirmed by sequencing. Where possible, in vitro confirmation of the functionality of the mutation should have been performed and documented.
- Presence of pain due to SFN for at least 3 months prior to Screening and an average self-reported pain score of at least 3 during this time.
- +3 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with predominantly signs of large nerve fiber involvement, clinically significant abnormal nerve conduction studies.
- History or presence of illnesses known to cause SFN (excluding diabetes mellitus).
- Subjects with other severe pain conditions which may impair the self-assessment of pain due to SFN.
- Any condition possibly affecting drug intake and absorption.
- History of known alcohol, analgesic or illicit drug abuse within 12 months of Screening.
- Subjects taking medications with activity at sodium channels. These medications are prohibited until the end of the study period and require a washout period of at least 5 half lives (90 days for capsaicin patches) prior to the Screening visit.
- lead ECG demonstrating QTcF (Fridericia's correction) \>450 or a QRS interval \>120 msec at Screening. If QTcF exceeds 450 msec, or QRS exceeds 120 msec, the ECG should be repeated two more times and the average of the three QTcF values should be used to determine the subject's eligibility.
- Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL/min).
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives preceding the first dose of study medication.
- Participation in other studies during the period of current study participation, or has planned surgery during the course of the study.
- Pregnant females; breastfeeding females; females of childbearing potential not using effective contraception or not agreeing to continue effective contraception for at least 28 days after the last dose of investigational product.
- Other clinically significant or unstable, or severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric/psychological condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the Investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
- In the case of incidental findings the patient and his/her treating physician will be informed and asked to undertake action if necessary. If a patient does not want to be informed about possible incidental findings, nor wants his treating physician to be informed, he or she cannot participate in this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Faber CG, Hoeijmakers JG, Ahn HS, Cheng X, Han C, Choi JS, Estacion M, Lauria G, Vanhoutte EK, Gerrits MM, Dib-Hajj S, Drenth JP, Waxman SG, Merkies IS. Gain of function Nanu1.7 mutations in idiopathic small fiber neuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2012 Jan;71(1):26-39. doi: 10.1002/ana.22485. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
PMID: 21698661BACKGROUNDde Greef BTA, Hoeijmakers JGJ, Geerts M, Oakes M, Church TJE, Waxman SG, Dib-Hajj SD, Faber CG, Merkies ISJ. Lacosamide in patients with Nav1.7 mutations-related small fibre neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Brain. 2019 Feb 1;142(2):263-275. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy329.
PMID: 30649227DERIVEDde Greef BT, Merkies IS, Geerts M, Faber CG, Hoeijmakers JG. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide in patients with gain-of-function Nav1.7 mutation-related small fiber neuropathy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial-the LENSS study. Trials. 2016 Jun 30;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1430-1.
PMID: 27363506DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catharina G Faber, MD, PhD
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2013
First Posted
July 30, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01