NCT01908127

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Filmed modelling in comparison with commonly used Tell-Show-Do technique on the anxious and cooperative behaviour of 4-6 years old children during dental practice.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2010

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2010

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2011

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 17, 2013

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 25, 2013

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 20, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

January 20, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

July 17, 2013

Results QC Date

July 28, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

film modellingdental anxietycooperative behaviourchildren

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Behaviors of Children

    A video-camera was focused started to record child's behavior. The recorded video tapes were independently evaluated by 2 paediatric dentists who were blind to the grouping of the children. Children's anxiety reactions and cooperative behaviours were scored based on venham scale and Frankle Index ,respectively. quantification was performed at the injection of local anaesthesia and at the beginning of the tooth preparation. An average of both two time points scoring was used. Table 1: Venham 6-point Index 0 = Relaxed: 1 = Uneasy: 2 = Tense: 3 = Reluctant: 4 = Interference: 5 = Out of contact Table 2: Frankle 4-point Index 1:Definitely Negative ( uncooperative,Refusal of treatment ) , 2:Negative ( some evidence of negative attitude but not pronounced) , 3:Positive ( Acceptance of treatment, at times cautious) , 4:Definitely Positive( Good rapport with the dentist)

    participants followed for the duration of examination and treatment appointment, an expected average of 3 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Index of Heart Rate

    before and after the injection of local anesthesia solution

Study Arms (2)

tell- show- do procedure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group I (Tell- Show- Do Group): Tell-Show-Do, prophylaxis with paste and rubber cap and fluoride therapy was performed by the dentist for each participant in the operation room. In the second session,injection of loal anesthesia solution including a mandibular alveolar nerve block technique and the occlusal cavity preparation was performed.

Behavioral: tell- show- doDrug: injection of local anesthesia solutionProcedure: occlusal cavity preparation

film modelling

EXPERIMENTAL

Group II (Filmed modelling Group): the children were directed to a quiet and comfort room to watch a film presented by a dental assistant. The film showed that the same procedure consisted of Tell-Show-Do, prophylaxis with paste and rubber cap and fluoride therapy was performed on a 5-years-old child model with a time of 20 minutes. The child in the film was cooperative and was reinforced by a reward at the end of the procedure. In the second session, injection of loal anesthesia solution including a mandibular alveolar nerve block technique and the occlusal cavity preparation was performed.

Behavioral: film modellingDrug: injection of local anesthesia solutionProcedure: occlusal cavity preparation

Interventions

tell- show- doBEHAVIORAL

Children came in the operation room. Tell-Show-Do, prophylaxis with paste and rubber cap and fluoride therapy was performed by the dentist for each participant to increase their familiarity with dental procedures. The duration of the appointment was about 20 minutes and constant for all children.

tell- show- do procedure
film modellingBEHAVIORAL

the children were directed to a quiet and comfort room to watch a film presented by a dental assistant. The film showed that the same procedure consisted of Tell-Show-Do, prophylaxis with paste and rubber cap and fluoride therapy was performed on a 5-years-old child model with a time of 20 minutes. The child in the film was cooperative and was reinforced by a reward at the end of the procedure.

film modelling

A topical anesthesia and injection of local anesthesia solution using mandibular alveolar nerve block technique was performed by the dentist

film modellingtell- show- do procedure

the occlusal cavity was prepared for pulpotomy and restoration of the teeth

film modellingtell- show- do procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 6 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • children aged 4-6 years
  • caries lesion in one of the primary mandibular molars needs to pulpotomy and restoration treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • children with systemic diseases and developmental disorders
  • previous experience of hospitalization

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zahedan Dental School

Zahedan, Iran

Location

Limitations and Caveats

providing a quiet environment and patient sampling were the most important limitations.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Mehrsa Paryab
Organization
Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Study Officials

  • mehrsa paryab, Dr

    dental school, tehran university of medical sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assisstant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2013

First Posted

July 25, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2011

Study Completion

April 1, 2011

Last Updated

January 20, 2014

Results First Posted

January 20, 2014

Record last verified: 2013-12

Locations