Clinical Effects of Tooth Powder on Gingivitis
Toothpowder
Evaluation of the Clinical Effects of Tooth Powder on Plaque Induced Gingivitis
1 other identifier
interventional
154
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Dental plaque, known as dental biofilm, is implicated as the primary etiological agent responsible for oral inflammatory diseases. Matured form of dental plaque plays a major role in the pathogenicity of gingivitis; if not managed in early stages it results in a cascade of events leading to the destruction of periodontal tissues. Effective plaque control techniques have been suggested that maintain dental biofilm at levels compatible with oral health and is the cornerstone for all preventive strategies to control oral diseases particularly gingivitis. To clean teeth and ensure effective plaque control, different mechanical means have been in use since centuries. However because of an inadequacy in plaque removal, different antimicrobial and antiplaque agents have been introduced in oral-care products. The use of dentifrices has been recommended over the years as the ultimate way of preventing the incidence of oral diseases. Dentifrices have the anti-plaque and the anti-gingivitis capabilities due to their composition. Toothpastes and to a lesser extent toothpowders are common oral-care products used to eliminate plaque and other deposits from tooth surfaces. Existent literature has focused more on toothpaste and mouth rinse and derelicts toothpowder despite its difference owing to the absence of humectants. With the intention to advance the knowledge on this issue as well as close the research gap, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of toothpowder in alleviating gingivitis, controlling dental plaque, and inhibiting extrinsic stains. A single-blind, parallel arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the efficacy of toothpowder against toothpaste through oral hygiene parameters of plaque and stain deposits on teeth and gingival inflammation. Plaque Index, Lobene Stain Index and Gingival Index were used as measures of oral hygiene. The current RCT revealed that toothpowder and toothpaste were equally effective in both treatment and control groups from clinical perspective however toothpowder showed a statistically significant effectiveness as compared to toothpaste. Toothpowder, composed of calcium carbonate and essential oils, has demonstrated to be statistically more effective than toothpaste in controlling extrinsic dental staining, dental plaque and gingival inflammation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2013
CompletedJuly 18, 2013
May 1, 2013
8 months
May 9, 2013
July 17, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gingivitis
Gingival Index (Löe and Silness, 1963) modified by Talbott et al. (1977) was used for the assessment of the gingival condition and record qualitative changes in the gingiva. Its scores (0 to 3) recorded the marginal and interproximal tissues separately. The criteria are: 0= normal gingiva, 1= mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing, 2= moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing and 3= severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with a tendency to spontaneous bleeding.
November 2010 - October 2011 (up to 1 year)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Plaque
November 2010 - October 2011 (up to 1 year)
External tooth stains
November 2010 - October 2011 (up to 1 year)
Study Arms (2)
Tooth powder (test) arm
EXPERIMENTALExperimental arm: tooth powder
Tooth Paste (control)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTooth Paste
Interventions
Each participant was handed over a sealed pack containing a teeth cleaning kit that included tooth powder (test) or toothpaste (control) and a new soft toothbrush along with written and verbal instructions of usage. They were advised to brush their teeth twice a day with the given dentifrices and tooth brush for two weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female
- Age ≥ 18-to-65 years (18th birthday completed)
- In good general health
- Available for the duration of the study
- Able and willing to follow study protocol
- Able and willing to sign approved informed consent
- At least 20 natural teeth suitable for evaluation
- Full mouth Gingival Index (GI) score ≥ 1.04
You may not qualify if:
- Females disagree to birth control measure for the duration of the study
- Having any acute /chronic systemic illness
- Current smokers or tobacco users
- Pregnant or lactating Females
- Allergy to the ingredients of the products to be tested
- Requiring pre-medication prior to dental appointment
- Antibiotic use in the last 3 months
- Routine use of anticoagulant medication
- Routine use of anti-inflammatory medication
- Routine use of medications known to have effects on the gingiva e.g., phenytoin etc)
- Routine use of medications inhibiting or stimulating salivary flow
- Physical handicap that could interfere with daily performance of oral hygiene
- Participation in any other study during the study period of this trial
- Routine use of any mouthrinse
- Routine use of any interdental cleaning device (floss, dental toothpicks)
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ayyaz A Khan, PhD
University of the Punjab
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2013
First Posted
July 18, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 18, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05