A Study Comparing SB4 to Enbrel® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multicentre Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity of SB4 Compared to Enbrel® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
596
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre clinical study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of SB4 compared to Enbrel in subjects with moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) despite Methotrexate (MTX) therapy. In some countries, after 52 weeks of treatment with either SB4 or Enbrel, subjects will be enrolled into an open label extension period. Subjects will receive SB4 for an additional 48 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Jun 2013
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 29, 2016
CompletedAugust 17, 2017
December 1, 2015
10 months
July 3, 2013
July 13, 2016
July 10, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Criteria (ACR20)
Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (2)
ACR20
Week 52
American College of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria (ACR50)
Week 24, Week 52
Study Arms (2)
SB4 (proposed biosimilar to etanercept)
EXPERIMENTALSB4 50 mg/week via subcutaneous injection
Enbrel (etanercept)
ACTIVE COMPARATOREnbrel 50 mg/week via subcutaneous injection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed as having RA according to the revised 1987 ACR criteria for at least 6 months but not exceeding 15 years prior to Screening
- Have moderate to severe active disease despite MTX therapy defined as having more than or equal to six swollen joints and more than or equal to six tender joints and either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, Westergren) ≥ 28 mm/h or serum C-reactive protein ≥ 1.0 mg/dL
- Must have been treated with MTX for at least 6 months prior to Randomisation and on a stable dose of MTX 10-25 mg/week given at least 4 weeks prior to Screening
- Female subjects who are not pregnant or nursing at Screening and who are not planning to become pregnant from Screening until 2 months after the last dose of investigational product
You may not qualify if:
- Have been treated previously with any biological agents including any tumour necrosis factor inhibitor
- Have a known hypersensitivity to human immunoglobulin proteins or other components of Enbrel or SB4
- Have a positive serological test for hepatitis B or hepatitis C or have a known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus
- Have a current diagnosis of active tuberculosis
- Have had a serious infection or have been treated with intravenous antibiotics for an infection within 8 weeks or oral antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to Randomisation.
- Have any of the following conditions
- Other inflammatory or rheumatic diseases.
- History of any malignancy within the previous 5 years prior to Screening
- History of lymphoproliferative disease including lymphoma.
- History of congestive heart failure
- Physical incapacitation (ACR functional Class IV or wheelchair-/bed-bound).
- History of demyelinating disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Investigational Site
Kielce, Poland
Investigational Site
Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Emery P, Suh CH, Weinblatt ME, Smolen JS, Keystone EC, Genovese M, Vencovsky J, Kay J, Hong E, Baek Y, Ghil J. Impact of immunogenicity on efficacy and tolerability of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: pooled analysis of biosimilar studies in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;49(5):361-370. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2020.1732458. Epub 2020 May 29.
PMID: 32468892DERIVEDSmolen JS, Choe JY, Weinblatt ME, Emery P, Keystone E, Genovese MC, Myung G, Hong E, Baek I, Ghil J. Pooled analysis of TNF inhibitor biosimilar studies comparing radiographic progression by disease activity states in rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2020 Jan;6(1):e001096. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001096.
PMID: 31958281DERIVEDEmery P, Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, Leszczynski P, Porawska W, Baranauskaite A, Tseluyko V, Zhdan VM, Stasiuk B, Milasiene R, Barrera Rodriguez AA, Cheong SY, Ghil J. 52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Dec 1;56(12):2093-2101. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex269.
PMID: 28968793DERIVEDEmery P, Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, Leszczynski P, Porawska W, Stasiuk B, Hilt J, Mosterova Z, Cheong SY, Ghil J. Long-term efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on SB4 or switching from reference etanercept to SB4. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov 13;76(12):1986-1991. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211591.
PMID: 28794078DERIVEDEmery P, Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, Leszczynski P, Porawska W, Baranauskaite A, Tseluyko V, Zhdan VM, Stasiuk B, Milasiene R, Barrera Rodriguez AA, Cheong SY, Ghil J. A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):51-57. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207588. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
PMID: 26150601DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Development
- Organization
- Samsung Bioepis
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jiri Vencovsky, M.D., Ph.D.
Charles University, Czech Republic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2013
First Posted
July 10, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 17, 2017
Results First Posted
August 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-12