NCT01888198

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand how effective ablation is for destroying tumor cells in the kidney and whether quality of life is improved for patients. Participation in ARMOR may involve retrospective data collection only, combined retrospective and prospective data collection, or prospective data collection

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
294

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
1mo left

Started Jun 2013

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress99%
Jun 2013Jun 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2013

Completed
12.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 25, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

13 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ablationquality of Life (QOL)kidneyregistryAblation of Renal Masses Outcomes Registry (ARMOR)13-116

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • assess renal ablation outcomes

    To assess renal ablation outcomes using standard quality of life measures. Specifically, quality of life outcomes measures will be analyzed with respect to ablation procedure characteristics including ablation technique and anesthesia type as well as renal mass characteristics such as size, location and pathologic tumor type.

    5 years

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • differences in imaging characteristics

    5 years

  • Assess the progression of imaging findings

    5 years

  • Radiation exposure

    5 years

Study Arms (1)

renal mass ablation candidates

Standard of care interventions for the treatment of renal masses using energy ablation will be studied. Data collection can be divided into five basic categories: 1) Patient demographics and relevant history, 2) Renal mass characteristics, 3) Ablation procedure details, 4) Imaging studies, and 5) Patient-reported quality of life.

Behavioral: (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaireBehavioral: EuroQol EQ-5D 7-item questionnaire

Interventions

Also known as: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item
renal mass ablation candidates
renal mass ablation candidates

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The patients at MSKCC will be identified and recruited from the existing patient population in the Interventional Radiology Service in the Department of Radiology. At all other participating sites, patients meeting eligibility criteria will be identified by the site investigators that have received the referral for consideration of renal mass ablation. Participation in ARMOR may involve retrospective data collection only, combined retrospective and prospective data collection, or prospective data collection

You may qualify if:

  • Retrospective enrollment:
  • \- Patients having undergone percutaneous, open or laparoscopic energy ablation of a renal mass.
  • Prospective enrollment:
  • \- Patients scheduled to undergo, rather than having undergone, percutaneous, open or laparoscopic energy ablation of a renal mass.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients not having undergone, or considered candidates for percutaneous, open or laparoscopic energy ablation of a renal mass
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • Patients under the age of 18.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

University of California, Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, 10065, United States

Location

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

Location

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States

Location

Md Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Neoplasms

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Fourat Ridouani, MD

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
24 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2013

First Posted

June 27, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations