Study Stopped
Lack of funding
Adequacy of Perioperative Cefazolin for Surgery Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Obese Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The population continues to increase in weight. Currently there are no guidelines in the dosing of cefazolin for the obese population. Standard dosing of cefazolin 2 grams for patients \<120 kg and 3 grams for patients \>120 kg is used as the dose for surgical prophylaxis. This makes no provisions for weight based dosing. There has been some recent data which states this might not be enough for the obese patients. The primary objective of this study is to determine if weight based dosing (30 mg/kg) of cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective gastric bypass/laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass provides appropriate serum concentrations for a larger percentage of time than the current method of giving the standard 2 or 3 gram doses of cefazolin peri-operatively. The concentration of cefazolin in tissue will also be measured to help assess this question.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2018
CompletedDecember 6, 2017
December 1, 2017
1.1 years
February 28, 2013
December 4, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of the Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in the Morbidly Obese
Since the goal of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis is to achieve free (unbound) serum and tissue drug levels that exceed the MIC for likely pathogens across the duration of the surgical procedure, and since redosing of cefazolin is recommended every 3-4 hours, PK/PD performance of cefazolin over that time frame will be analyzed. For the purposes of this study, pharmacodynamic targets are defined as fT\>MIC (time during which free drug concentrations exceed pathogen MICs) of 100% over periods of up to 4 hours in duration. The PK/PD probability of target attainment (PTA) for pharmacodynamic goals and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for both cefazolin regimens will be compared. A PTA of ≥90% and a CFR of ≥ 90% for a dosage regimen (i.e., predicted to meet pharmacodynamic targets in ≥ 90% of the total bacterial population across the full range of MICs) are considered optimum.
Before cefazolin admin., then at 10, 30, 60, 120, 180 minutes after injection and at wound closure.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Incidence of surgical site infection
Within 1 month postoperatively
Hospital length of stay
Hospital discharge
Hospital readmission
Witihn 1 month after hospital discharge
Incidence of adverse outcomes
Within 1 month postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard dose group (2 g intravenous (IV) cefazolin dose for patients \<120 kg, and 3 g IV cefazolin for patients \>120 kg)
Treatment group
EXPERIMENTALWeight-based dose group (30 mg/kg cefazolin IV)
Interventions
The standard dose of Cefazolin will be administered intravenously.
The weight-based dose group will receive 30 mg/kg cefazolin dose intravenously.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI greater than 40
- No known history of allergy to cephalosporins
- Scheduled for elective gastric bypass or laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass procedures
- Able to read and understand English
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \<18 years of age or \>89 Years of age
- Pregnant women, prisoners and decisionally challenged subjects will be excluded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pierre Moine, M.D.
University of Colorado, Denver
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2013
First Posted
June 26, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 1, 2018
Study Completion
October 1, 2018
Last Updated
December 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share