NCT01883375

Brief Summary

Dying patients and their families face many challenges near the end-of-life. Not only do patients often experience physical distress, but they also have feelings of loss of dignity, isolation, and uncertainty. Family members also face many challenges. They bear witness to the suffering of loved ones, and they face uncertainty, loss, and at times a mounting sense of helplessness. The purpose of this study is to introduce and evaluate a new intervention called Dignity Talk, meant to enhance end-of-life experience for both patients and their families. Dignity Talk is based on a set of questions by which terminally ill patients and their family members can engage in meaningful conversations with each other. It is intended to lessen feelings of loss and helplessness and enhance feelings of connectedness by facilitating conversations that tap into a sense of meaning and purpose, sharing of memories, wishes, hopes, and giving guidance to those who will soon be left behind. In Phase 1, 20 patients and family members will help finalize the method and Dignity Talk question framework (is it easy to understand, do the investigators have the right questions, and is the wording sensitive). In Phase 2 of the study the investigators will ask 100 patient-family pairs for feedback about Dignity Talk: what influence it had on their palliative care experience, whether it works well, and whether this intervention should become a regular part of palliative care. The investigators will also ask for feedback from health-care providers in both phases. We are requesting approval for an amendment to the healthcare provider feedback focus group questions. Will add those documents when they are approved. Four to six months after the death of their loved one, the investigators will contact the family member to ask their thoughts about Dignity Talk, how it shaped their experience of their grief and bereavement. The investigators expect that the study will show that Dignity Talk can be an effective, highly accessible palliative care intervention, which will enhance the end-of-life experience for palliative patients and the families who support them.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

13 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 11, 2013

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2013

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

February 11, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Palliative CareFamilyadaptation, psychological

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Family communication connectedness Index

    31 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    31 months

Study Arms (2)

Dignity Talk dyad completers

EXPERIMENTAL

Those dyads where both patient and family member co-participant complete the protocol using the Dignity Talk Communication Topics

Behavioral: Dignity Talk

Dignity Talk non-completers

EXPERIMENTAL

Those dyads where patient and family member co-participant either do not complete the protocol or do not use the Dignity Talk Communication Topics (November 2016 - the investigators have not as yet enrolled any participants who have not completed the study without using the Dignity Talk Topics. However some participants have withdrawn from the study without completing.

Behavioral: The Dignity Talk Communication Topics

Interventions

Dignity TalkBEHAVIORAL

Patient and family member participants will be given the Dignity Talk framework questions and asked to use them in conversation with each other. Research nurse will return at day 4-6 to confirm both participants have covered all items they wish to discuss. 4-6 months after the death of patient, family members will be contacted in order to collect data pertaining to their bereavement experiences and distress. Will also be asked to complete evaluative feedback on Dignity Talk.

Dignity Talk dyad completers

There have not been any non-completers - this arm not being used currently

Dignity Talk non-completers

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • For Patient:
  • Patients being cared for:
  • in a palliative care unit or whose care is focused on palliation as determined by clinical staff
  • or patients who have have a confirmed diagnosis of amyotropic lateral sclerosis, and have symptoms in a domain that interferes with their social or occupation functioning: a) mobility, b) dysphasia, c) dyspnea, or d) speech or patients who have are have been on dialysis \> 3 months and are \> 60 years of age - or residents of Personal Care Home all of whom are:
  • years of age or older
  • able to provide informed oral and written consent
  • cognitive capacity (based on clinical consensus)
  • For Family Member or Close Friend:
  • Family member or close friend who the patient identifies they would be comfortable talking with using the Dignity Talk question framework
  • Family member who is 18 years of age or older
  • Family member who is able to provide oral and written consent
  • Family member who has cognitive capacity to participate in meaningful conversation (based on research staff decision)
  • For Healthcare Provider:
  • Employed one of the participating sites
  • in a discipline directly involved in clinical care (physician, nursing, social work, spiritual care, allied healthcare, etc.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

Victoria Hospice

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Location

St. Boniface Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9, Canada

Location

Riverview Health Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3L 2P4, Canada

Location

Concordia Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Deer Lodge Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Grace Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Health Sciences Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Manitoba Renal Program

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Seven Oaks Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Victoria Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Winnipeg Regional Health Authority

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

WRHA Personal Care Homes

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Dr. Bob Kemp Hospice

Hamilton, Ontario, L9B 1B1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Guo Q, Chochinov HM, McClement S, Thompson G, Hack T. Development and evaluation of the Dignity Talk question framework for palliative patients and their families: A mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):195-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734696. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2013

First Posted

June 21, 2013

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

September 30, 2017

Study Completion

October 31, 2017

Last Updated

December 14, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-11

Locations