Comparing Laboratory Blood Glucose Results With HemoCue Glucose 201 RT
CFRD
To Compare the Clinical Accuracy of Glucose Measurement During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Using Two Methods: i) Laboratory Standard Technique, ii) HemoCue Glucose 201 RT System
1 other identifier
observational
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There are very few studies comparing the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of HemoCue glucose 201 RT system with the laboratory gold standard. The incidence of cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) has risen significantly as patients' survival improves. Around 30% of all cystic fibrosis (CF) adult patients have CFRD. Early diagnosis of CFRD is important to slow the deterioration of lung function and nutritional status, both of which increase mortality. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the accepted method for detecting CFRD and the Cystic Fibrosis Trust guidelines recommend that patients with CF over the age of twelve years should be screened annually. The World Health Organisation has pointed out that due to the absence of a more specific biological marker to define diabetes, plasma glucose estimation remains the basis of diagnostic criteria. WHO recommends that venous plasma glucose should be the standard method for measuring and reporting glucose concentration in blood. However, it has also recognised that there is a widespread use of capillary sampling. Although fasting values for venous and capillary plasma glucose are the same, in the nonfasting state capillary samples will give higher results than venous samples, and glucose values require conversion which can be problematic. HemoCue Glucose 201 RT (HGS 201 RT) analyzer with plasma conversion provides laboratory quality test results at the point of care for the diagnosis, screening and monitoring of diabetes mellitus. The analyzer is easy to use and the system can be operated by nonlaboratory personnel, also the results can be presented immediately, leading to significant time and resource saving. The patient also benefits from having the result immediately instead of waiting for several hours. With immediate result, the doctor and health care professionals can provide education, support and reassurance, and implement care plans, if appropriate, at the earliest opportunity. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical accuracy of HemoCue Glucose 201 RT with the laboratory standard method in the analysis of blood glucose concentration during oral glucose tolerance test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedNovember 13, 2014
November 1, 2014
10 months
June 13, 2013
November 12, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Does HemoCue Glucose 201 RT provide lab-quality results in the analysis of glucose values during oral glucose tolerance tests?
The glucose value from the HemoCue Glucose 201 RT will be compared with the Trust Laboratory value. The sensitivity, specificity and clinical significance will be calculated.
One year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Is HemoCue Glucose 201 RT method cost saving relative to the traditional laboratory method for analysing glucose values taken during oral glucose tolerance tests?
One year
Other Outcomes (1)
2. To see if the HemoCue Glucose 201 RT offers sufficient advantages to make it a viable alternative to conventional testing
One year
Study Arms (2)
Laboratory blood glucose
Blood glucose value from Lab
HemoCue Glucose 201 RT
Blood glucose value from HemoCue Glucose 201 RT
Interventions
The glucose value from the HemoCue Glucose 201 RT will be compared with the Trust Laboratory value.
Eligibility Criteria
The first 70 consecutive adult CF patients, without cystic fibrosis related diabetes, who are 16 years of age and over, attending annual review at the Royal Brompton Hospital from June 2013, are eligible for the study.
You may qualify if:
- The first 70 consecutive suitable consenting adult CF patients, who are 16 years of age and over, attending annual review at the Royal Brompton Hospital from June 2013 to March 2014, are eligible for the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with an existing diagnosis of CFRD are exclude.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal Brompton Hospital
London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicholas J Simmonds, MD MRCP
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2013
First Posted
June 21, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 13, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11