Study Stopped
This study was terminated after a pre-specified interim analysis. Please see Detailed Study Description for further information.
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Piracetam on Aphasia After Acute Ischemic Cerebral Artery Stroke
Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Two Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Piracetam, 12 g Intravenous (IV) Infusion Within 7 Hour (h) Post Stroke Onset, Followed by 12 g/d for 4 Weeks (IV Ampoules, Oral Solution) and 4.8 g/d for 8 Weeks (Tablets) in Adult Subjects With an Acute Ischemic Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
571
15 countries
44
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of piracetam after 12 weeks of treatment on the aphasic status of subjects suffering from aphasia after acute ischemic middle cerebral artery stroke and having received their medication within 7 h post-stroke onset.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Aug 1998
Typical duration for phase_4
44 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 1998
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2013
CompletedAugust 30, 2013
August 1, 2013
2.9 years
June 18, 2013
August 28, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of subjects recovering from aphasia as per the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (FAST) score at Day 84
FAST describes the presence, absence or severity of aphasia, but does not differentiate types of aphasia. Comprehension, expression and reading were main score targets tested by picture card with attached reading card. The FAST score covered a range from 0-20. Subjects with FAST score ≤13 where considered as aphasic and subjects with FAST score \> 13 were considered as non-aphasic. There were 2 tests of comprehension and 2 tests of expression and 1 of reading, however the reading test was not included in the primary efficacy variable.
Day 84
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Middle Cerebral Artery infarction scale (MCA) score at Day 84
Day 84
Total Barthel Index (BI) score at Day 84
Day 84
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score at Day 84
Day 84
Study Arms (2)
Piracetam
EXPERIMENTALIV infusion 12 g piracetam in 60 ml IV Ampoules 3 g piracetam in 15 ml Oral solution 33 % piracetam (bottle of 125 ml) Oral tablets 1200 mg piracetam (blisters of 10 tablets)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORIV infusion 12 g placebo in 60 ml IV Ampoules 3 g placebo in 15 ml Oral solution 33% placebo (bottle of 125 ml) Oral tablets 1200 mg placebo (blisters of 10 tablets) All IV forms were identical in presentation, size and color to allow a double blind design. All oral forms were identical in shape, size, color and taste to allow a double blind design.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female adults ≥ 50 years
- Considered as reliable and mentally capable of adhering to the protocol
- Clinical diagnosis of a middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke
- Treated before 7 h (6 h and 59 minutes) after the estimated stroke onset
- If the subject had a stroke during the night, the onset of stroke is assumed to be the last time the subject was seen awake and normal, or last time the subject remembered he/she was awake and normal
- Being aphasic, defined as having an Aphasia Severity Rating (ASR) score of \< 3
You may not qualify if:
- Stupor or coma: \< 10 on the item consciousness of the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) scale
- A previous stroke with clinical sequel or a previous stroke with aphasia (even in case of complete recovery from aphasia)
- A medical or neurological disease interfering with the assessments and causing a clear deficit:
- \. in functional ability or autonomy
- \. in motor function
- \. in cognitive capacities
- \. in language
- A systemic disease with neurological symptoms
- A life threatening disease with life expectancy of less than 1 year
- \. Cerebro-vascular active products: bufenine, buflomedil, cinnarizine, codergocrinemesilate, citicholine, cyclandelate, cyprodemanol, deanolacetamidobenzoate, flunarizine, ginkgo-biloba extr., inositolnicotinate, isoxsuprine, meclofenoxate, naftidrofuryloxalate, nicergoline, nicotinic acid (smoking is allowed), nimodipine, pentifylline, papaverine, pentoxifylline, piracetam, pyrisuccideanoldimaleate, pyritinol, raubasine, vincamine, viquidil, xantinolnicotinate. A list of these drugs with generic and brand name, adapted to each of the participating countries accompanied the Case Report Form (CRF)
- \. Thrombolytics: recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase) (rt- PA), streptokinase, urokinase, ancrod
- \. Hemodilution
- \. Glucose infusion \>5 %
- Subjects known to not being able to be followed for 12 weeks
- Known alcohol or drug addiction or abuse
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (44)
050
Buenos Aires, Argentina
051
Buenos Aires, Argentina
004
Inssbruck, Austria
001
Linz, Austria
003
Linz, Austria
102
Antwerp, Belgium
103
Antwerp, Belgium
104
Brussels, Belgium
107
Genk, Belgium
150
Charleville-Mézières, France
152
Nice, France
201
Magdeburg, Germany
200
Minden, Germany
203
Nidda-bad-Salzhausen, Germany
202
Saarbrücken, Germany
251
Athens, Greece
252
Athens, Greece
302
Budapest, Greece
303
Budapest, Greece
305
Budapest, Greece
250
Thessaloniki, Greece
300
Budapest, Hungary
304
Debrecen, Hungary
301
Miskolc, Hungary
350
Perugia, Italy
750
Bergen, Norway
455
Bialystok, Poland
454
Krakow, Poland
456
Lodz, Poland
451
Poznan, Poland
450
Warsaw, Poland
452
Warsaw, Poland
600
Singapore, Singapore
601
Singapore, Singapore
501
Madrid, Spain
502
Madrid, Spain
503
Málaga, Spain
500
Terrassa, Spain
550
Stockholm, Sweden
700
Taipei, Taiwan
654
Edirne, Turkey (Türkiye)
650
Eskişehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
652
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
653
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
+1 877 822 9493
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2013
First Posted
June 21, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 1998
Primary Completion
July 1, 2001
Study Completion
July 1, 2001
Last Updated
August 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08