The Effect of Piracetam on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Patients
DPN
The Effect of Piracetam on the Clinical Outcomes of Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aim of the work: To evaluate efficacy and safety of Piracetam in Diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy. Scientific background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is known to precipitate various neurologic complications, with diabetic neuropathy (DN) emerging as a significant microvascular consequence affecting both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Notably, diabetic neuropathy can manifest even at the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Peripheral neuropathy stands as the most common subtype of diabetic neuropathy, impacting nearly half of all individuals with diabetes over their lifetimes, as per recent guidelines. The development of diabetic neuropathy (DN) involves various metabolic and cellular processes, including inflammation and oxidative stress. Inflammation, characterized by cytokines and inflammatory cells, plays a role in diabetic neuropathy progression. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute significantly, with low levels of antioxidants exacerbating the condition. Accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) further damages nerves. diabetic neuropathy leads to significant pain and discomfort for patients, yet current treatments often fall short of expectations. Improving treatment strategies is crucial to relieve suffering and improve the well-being of those affected by diabetic neuropathy. Piracetam shows promise in managing diabetic neuropathy (DN) based on both preclinical and clinical studies. It may enhance central nervous system function by influencing neurotransmitter release, potentially alleviating diabetic neuropathy symptoms. Additionally, piracetam's neuroprotective properties could shield nerve cells from oxidative stress and inflammation, which are key contributors to diabetic neuropathy nerve damage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 28, 2025
January 1, 2025
9 months
June 16, 2024
January 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Evaluation of efficacy:1. Measurment of McGill Pain Scale:
Neuropathic pain severity will be assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks during the whole study duration using The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ).The SF-MPQ is a concise assessment tool consisting of 15 items that evaluate both the sensory and affective dimensions of pain experience, Participants rate the intensity of each item on a four-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). By summing the intensity values for the corresponding descriptors, sensory (11 items), affective (4 items), and total (15 items) pain scores can be obtained.
3 Months
Evaluation of efficacy: 2. Assessment of the vibratory sensation using Michigan neuropathy screening instrument
Assessment of patients' vibratory sensation will be performed using Michigan Neuropathy screening Instrument , The MNSI consists of two parts, one of them a questionnaire for the patient, a higher score (with a maximum of 13 points) indicates a greater presence of neuropathic symptoms, and the second part is done by the examiner and contains physical examination tests, A high score on the questionnaire, reduced or absent vibration sense, reduced or absent ankle reflexes, and reduced or absent sensation on the monofilament test are all indicative of neuropathic symptoms, suggesting the presence of diabetic neuropathy. Patients who score above 2 points on a 10-point scale in the clinical section of the MNSI are considered to have neuropathic symptoms.
3 Months
Evaluation of efficacy:3. Assessment of EQ-5D-5L Score:
Assessment of patients' Quality of life will be performed using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, The EQ-5D-5L consists of a concise descriptive system questionnaire and a visual analog scale (EQ VAS),The questionnaire captures a straightforward profile of an individual's health state, while the EQ VAS offers an alternative approach to gauge an individual's self-rated overall current health, The updated version of the EQ-5D, known as the EQ-5D-5L, introduces five levels of severity for each of the existing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Within the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system, there are five dimensions, and each dimension encompasses five response levels, ranging from 1 which indicates absence of problems to 5 which indicates Inability to perform/extreme problems.
3 Months
Evaluation of efficacy: 4. Assessment of Pittsburgh sleep quality index Score:
Sleep disturbance will be assessed, The Pittsburgh sleep quality index questionnaire about usual sleeping habits for the past month only. These questions are consolidated to create seven distinct "component" scores, each with a scoring range of 0-3 points. It is important to note that a score of "0" indicates the absence of any difficulties, while a score of "3" signifies the presence of severe difficulties. Subsequently, the seven component scores are combined to generate a single "global" score, spanning from 0 to 21 points. Within this framework, a score of "0" indicates the absence of any difficulties across all domains, while a score of "21" signifies the presence of severe difficulties in all areas.
3 Months
Evaluation of efficacy: 5. Measurment of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale
Cognitive function will be assessed. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which is a quick screening assessment used to detect elderly people who have mild cognitive impairment (MCI). It is a single-page examination that may be performed in 10 minutes. This test has a maximum score of 30, with a result of 26 or higher deemed normal. A score of less than 26 without associated functional impairment indicates a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Furthermore, a score of less than 26 combined with functional impairment implies that dementia is in its early stages. It is worth mentioning that an additional point is given whether the individual has completed 12 years of formal education or less.
3 Months
Evaluation of efficacy: 6. Evaluation of serum Brain-derived neurotrophic factor:
Blood sample will be withdrawn from each patient at baseline and after 3 months and separated sera will be stored at -80 C till analysis. Serum Brain-derived neurotrophic factor will be assessed for each patient using ELISA kits.
3 Months
7.Incidence of Adverse Events
Patients will be educated about any expected side effects and will be required to report any of them.
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Piracetam Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORreceiving standard care according to the institution's protocol, along with 800mg oral tablet of Piracetam three times every day for the whole duration of the study ( 3 Months) Standard care includes insulin therapy with or without oral hypoglycemics and vitamin b complex.
Control Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORwill receive standard care in accordance with the institution protocol in addition to placebo for 3 months. Standard care includes insulin therapy with or without oral hypoglycemics and vitamin b complex.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (\>the age of 18).
- Established diagnosis of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
- Patients receiving insulin therapy.
- HbA1C\>7.5%
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with inadequate hepatic function Alanine aminotransferase, Aspartate aminotransferase (ALT, AST \> or equal to 3 times upper normal limit).
- Patients with myopathy, epilepsy, malignancy, unstable psychiatric illness, bleeding tendency, or peripheral vascular diseases.
- Patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Less than 45 ml/min and albumin/creatinine ratio or urea to creatinine \>30.
- Patients with any conditions that could confound pain assessment (for ex: other severe pain or skin conditions in the area affected by neuropathy.
- Cognitive or language difficulties that would impair understanding/completion of the assessment instruments.
- Presence of foot ulcers.
- Causes of neuropathy other than diabetes and significant neurological diseases.
- Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women.
- Use anticonvulsants, antidepressants, membrane stabilizers, and opioids.
- Patients with a history of Substance use and alcohol abuse,
- Patients with a history of (cerebral hemorrhage) or at risk of blood diseases.
- Patients allergic to piracetam
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ain Shams Universitylead
- King Salman International universitycollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Teaching Assistant at clinical pharmacy department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2024
First Posted
June 28, 2024
Study Start
February 10, 2025
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion
November 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share