Study Stopped
Interim results suggested a concern for patient outcomes and safety
A Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus With Other Medicines in Recipients of ECD/DCD Kidneys
Evered
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus with low dose tacrolimus compared to early conversion to CNI-free regimen and MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients of ECD/DCD kidneys. Given tacrolimus and MMF/MPA is a widely prescribed immunosuppressive regimen in the United States, comparisons of tacrolimus and MMF/MPA regimens to investigational therapies and treatment regimens are needed. Also, considering the fact that ECD/DCD is a fast growing fraction of donors, evaluation of various regimens' effects on rather delicate ECD/DCD kidneys is necessary.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jun 2013
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 26, 2019
CompletedApril 26, 2019
April 1, 2019
4.4 years
June 11, 2013
April 4, 2019
April 4, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate Concentration-controlled Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus Compared to MMF/MPA With Standard Dose Tacrolimus at 24 Months
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus and low dose tacrolimus compared to MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus at 24 months post-transplant with respect to the composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR), graft loss, death, loss to follow-up) in de novo renal transplant recipients.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Compare Renal Function of the Everolimus Treatment Arms to the MMF/MPA Treatment Arm at 12 and 24 Months Post-transplantation
24 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (Viremia or Viruria)
24 months
Study Arms (3)
ERL & TAC
EXPERIMENTALConcentration controlled everolimus(ERL) \& Low dose tacrolimus(TAC) + corticosteroid withdraw
ERL & TAC --> MMF/MPA
EXPERIMENTALConcentration controlled everolimus \& low dose tacrolimus --\> mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at Month 3 + corticosteroid
Standard dose TAC + MMF/MPA
EXPERIMENTALStandard dose of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid withdraw
Interventions
One of the immunosuppressants currently being evaluated to replace CNIs in patients with CNI nephropathy is the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, Sirolimus. Everolimus is a derivative of Sirolimus and belongs to this class of immunosuppressants, therefore, both drugs have similar side effect profile. The half-life of Everolimus is almost half of Sirolimus (Everolimus 30 hours vs Sirolimus 62 hours), which makes its dose adjustment easier although it would require more frequent dosing. In clinical trials, Everolimus has demonstrated its potential role as a safe alternative in minimizing and/or eliminating CNI such as Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus .
One of the immunosuppressants currently being evaluated to replace CNIs in patients with CNI nephropathy is the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, Sirolimus. Everolimus is a derivative of Sirolimus and belongs to this class of immunosuppressants, therefore, both drugs have similar side effect profile. The half-life of Everolimus is almost half of Sirolimus (Everolimus 30 hours vs Sirolimus 62 hours), which makes its dose adjustment easier although it would require more frequent dosing. In clinical trials, Everolimus has demonstrated its potential role as a safe alternative in minimizing and/or eliminating CNI such as Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus.
Control Drug
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female recipients 18-65 years of age undergoing primary or secondary kidney transplantation
- Recipients of primary or secondary cadaveric, ECD/DCD kidney (defined as follows)
- Donor whose heart has irreversibly stopped beating, previously referred to as non-heart-beating or asystolic donation
- Brain-dead donor \> 60 years old
- Donor aged 50-59 years old with two of the following criteria:
- History of hypertension
- Terminal serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL
- Death resulting from cerebrovascular accident
- Patients who have given written informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Cold ischemic time (CIT) \> 30 hours
- Patients who are ABO incompatible transplants, or T, or B cell crossmatch positive transplant
- Patients with a known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical class
- Non-controlled DCD
- Donor age \>70
- Patients with BMI \>32 at baseline before surgery
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Females of childbearing potential unwilling to use an effective means of contraception or are planning to become pregnant
- Patients with platelet count \<100,000/mm3 at the evaluation before randomization.
- Patients with an absolute neutrophil count of \< 1,500/mm³ at baseline before surgery or white blood cell count of \< 4,500/mm³
- Patients who are recipients of multiple solid organ transplants
- Patients who have severe hypercholesterolemia (\>350 mg/dL; \>9 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (\>500 mg/dL; \>5.6 mmol/L). Patients with controlled hyperlipidemia are acceptable
- Patients who have an abnormal liver profile such as ALT, AST, Alk Phos or total bilirubin \>3 times the upper normal limit
- Patients who are treated with drugs that are strong inducers or inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4, such as terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, erythromycin, azithromycin, itraconazole, rifampin or lovastatin
- Patients who received an investigational drug or who have been treated with a non-protocol immunosuppressive drug or treatment within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to randomization
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Matthew Cooperlead
Study Sites (1)
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated prematurely and analysis was not performed on the incomplete data.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Matthew Cooper
- Organization
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Cooper
Georgetown University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Matthew Cooper
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2013
First Posted
June 17, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 26, 2019
Results First Posted
April 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04