Test of an Intervention to Increase Physical Activity Among School Children
Feeling States and Heart Rates; A Translational Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The specific aims of this study are to: 1) evaluate the impact of a novel intervention delivered via school-based physical education (PE) on adolescents who have a high sensitivity to exercise-induced negative affect; 2) determine whether adolescents' tendency to feel uncomfortable during exercise is a stable trait that persists even in the face of an intervention; and 3) compare and contrast three alternative methods of measuring adolescents' sensitivity to exercise-induced affect. Healthy middle-school students who do not participate in team or individual competitive sports will be recruited and assessed to determine their existing predisposition toward exercise (i.e., "reluctant exercisers" and "latent exercisers"). The assessment will be conducted using three methods that have been used to measure individuals' propensity to experience positive affect in the face of a stimulus: 1) a pencil-and-paper assessment that measures tendency to respond to a challenge with positive affect; 2) electroencephalogram (EEG) to ascertain frontal cortical asymmetry; and 3) empirically assessed affective response to a standardized exercise task. Reluctant and latent exercisers will be assigned in equal numbers to one of two conditions. One condition will implement a PE-based intervention that differs from the traditional approach in that students will be instructed to exercise at an intensity that has been determined to elicit positive affect in that individual (based on baseline testing). In the other condition, students will be instructed to exercise at an intensity derived from standard formulas typically used in exercise prescriptions. It is hypothesized that the non-traditional approach will increase reluctant exercisers' enjoyment of PE and also their level of participation in physical activity outside of PE. The latter will be determined using portable monitors (accelerometers) worn at baseline, after the intervention, and again 1 year after the end of the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable obesity
Started Apr 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedMay 15, 2018
May 1, 2018
5.9 years
June 10, 2013
May 14, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Physical Activity
Participation in physical activity is assessing objectively (using activity monitors), by self-report, and indirectly via cardiorespiratory fitness.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
affective response to exercise
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Exercise prescription
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are given an exercise prescription in the form of a target heart rate range for exercising. The range is determined based on their personal preferences so that it is an intensity that feels "good".
traditional exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORparticipants are given an exercise prescription based on percent of vo2 peak
Interventions
exercise prescription based on intensity of exercise that feels good.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy
- not a member of a sports team
- right handed
You may not qualify if:
- no past head trauma
- not depressed
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California at Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697, United States
Related Publications (3)
Schneider M, Schmalbach P, Godkin S. Impact of a personalized versus moderate-intensity exercise prescription: a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;40(2):239-248. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9776-0. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
PMID: 27481104BACKGROUNDSchneider M. Intrinsic Motivation Mediates the Association Between Exercise-Associated Affect and Physical Activity Among Adolescents. Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 30;9:1151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01151. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30104987DERIVEDSchneider M, Schmalbach P. Affective Response to Exercise and Preferred Exercise Intensity Among Adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2015 Apr;12(4):546-52. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0442. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
PMID: 24770461DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Margaret Schneider, PhD
University of California, Irvine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2013
First Posted
June 12, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 15, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05