NCT01873690

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to test whether administering one dose of an antibiotic before a routine shock wave lithotripsy procedure is more effective at avoiding any urinary infections compared to not taking an antibiotic. This is an important topic to study because urinary tract infections are one of the most common complications after this procedure and there is no clear standard of care regarding the use of pre-procedure antibiotics. Our study results will benefit future patients either by decreasing the rate of infections or decreasing the use of unnecessary antibiotics.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
360

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 3, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 10, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2016

Status Verified

February 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

June 3, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

AntibioticsShock Wave LithotripsyUrinary Tract Infection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the rate of urinary tract infection

    Our primary outcome will be a composite endpoint comprised of: Positive post-SWL urine culture (≥ 105 colony forming units / millilitre (CFU/ml), symptoms of cystitis (defined as new onset burning sensation or pain with voiding, frequency, urgency), or pyelonephritis or urosepsis (hospital admission with fever ≥38.5 C).

    Post SWL Day 7

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Bacteriuria post-SWL (≥105 cfu/ml)

    7-14 days

  • Symptoms of cystitis (new onset burning sensation or pain with voiding, frequency, urgency)

    7-14 days

  • Pyelonephritis or urosepsis (hospital admission with fever ≥38.5C)

    7-14 days

  • Change in Urinary Symptom Score(reported as positive or negative integer)

    7 - 14 days

Study Arms (2)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo

Drug: Placebo

Ciprofloxacin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ciprofloxacin

Drug: Ciprofloxacin

Interventions

Once, 400 mg IV

Also known as: Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride
Ciprofloxacin

5% Dextrose in water

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Scheduled for SWL at St. Joseph's Hospital;
  • years of age or older;
  • Willing and able to complete Questionnaires;
  • Willing to submit urine sample for analysis at Day 7;
  • Able to read and speak English.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pre-SWL urine analysis positive for nitrites or urine culture reveals \>105 CFU/ml of bacteria (positive urine culture);
  • Taking antibiotics for UTI or other cause;
  • Requires an antibiotic post SWL;
  • Suspected struvite stone (based on previous stone analysis, or partial staghorn);
  • Presence of nephrostomy tube;
  • Requiring cystoscopy on the day of SWL;
  • Requiring ureteral stent on the day of SWL;
  • Presence of indwelling urinary catheter or on regular clean intermittent catheterization (CIC);
  • Presence of urinary diversion (ie: ileal conduit);
  • Any history of urosepsis;
  • Known allergic reaction to ciprofloxacin/quinolones;
  • Patient known to be pregnant;
  • Previous randomization in this trial;
  • In the opinion of the urologist, it is not in the patient's best interest to participate.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St. Joseph's Hospital, St. Joseph's Health Care London

London, Ontario, N6A 4V2, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

UrolithiasisUrinary Tract Infections

Interventions

Ciprofloxacin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesInfections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fluoroquinolones4-QuinolonesQuinolonesQuinolinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Hassan Razvi, MD, FRCSC

    Western University & Lawson Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2013

First Posted

June 10, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

February 8, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations