Comparison of General Anaesthesia and Sedation on the Stone Fragmentation in Lithotripsy
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to compare the impact intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of stone fragmentation in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedMay 26, 2011
April 1, 2011
1 year
May 11, 2011
May 25, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of stone fragmentation during lithotripsy treatment under general anesthesia and sedation
Stone fragmentation is measured as disappearence of the stone on flouroscopic monitoring and number of shocks utilised to break the stone during the lithotripsy treatment under general anesthesia (controlled ventilation) or with intravenous sedation(spontaneous ventilation)will be compared in this study.
One year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Anesthesia complications
One year
Study Arms (1)
Intravenous sedation, General anaesthesia
EXPERIMENTALIV sedation-ESWL under spontaneous respiration GA - ESWL under controlled respiration
Interventions
The efficacy of stone fragmentation during lithotripsy procedure is compared under two types of anaesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Renal or upper ureteral stone of less than 2cm
- A.S.A Grade 1.2.3
- Age above 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Mid or lower ureteral stones
- Bilateral renal stones
- Multiple stones
- Use of regional anesthesia
- Coagulopathies (thrombocytopenia, anticoagulation drugs)
- Suspected or documented difficult intubation
- History of chronic opioid abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hadassah Medical Organization
Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fayez Saifi, MD
Hadassah Medical Organization
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2011
First Posted
May 26, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 26, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-04