NCT01873144

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is superior to hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in the treatment of moderate acute viral bronchiolitis in infants in improving respiratory distress and comfort and reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) and admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2010

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 29, 2013

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 7, 2013

Status Verified

June 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

May 29, 2013

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

BronchiolitisHypertonic saline solutionHigh-flow oxygen therapyRespiratory distressComfort

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in mean Respiratory Assessment Change Score (RACS) between groups in every time considered

    RACS is calculated by combining 2 values: the difference between the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) score before and after treatment, plus a value of +1 for each 10% improvement (decrease) in the posttreatment respiratory rate (RR) or a value of -1 for each 10% worsening (increase) in RR.

    Every 4h for three consecutive times beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study and after every 8h for three consecutive times (average of 36h)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in mean comfort score along the monitoring period between groups

    Every 8h for 6 consecutive times (two days) beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Length of hospital stay (LOS) in days in both groups

    Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days

  • Admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit PICU (rate) in both groups

    Transfer to PICU at any time during hospitalization

Study Arms (2)

HSS (3%) + epinephrine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of HSS(3%) every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.

Drug: Epinephrine 1/1000Drug: HSS 3%

HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)

EXPERIMENTAL

Flow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.

Drug: Epinephrine 1/1000Device: HHHFNCDrug: NS (0.9%)

Interventions

Nebulization of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

Also known as: Adrenaline 1/1000, Adrenalin 1/1000
HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)HSS (3%) + epinephrine
HSS 3%DRUG

Nebulization 2 mL of HSS (3%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

HSS (3%) + epinephrine
HHHFNCDEVICE

Precision Flow (Vapotherm Inc. Stevensville, Maryland, US ) and RT329 (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) were the dispositive used depending on the availability. Fisher and Paykel nasal cannula was used in both devices, depending on age

HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)

Nebulization of 2 mL of NS (0.9%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

Also known as: Normal saline solution 0.9%, Physiologic saline solution
HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 6 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children aged 6 months or less
  • Moderate (Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score of 4 or greater) viral bronchiolitis (as defined by McConnockie)
  • Meeting Admission criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • History of prematurity
  • Chronic lung disease
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Airway anomalies
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Those requiring immediate intubation and ventilation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon

Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa

Leganés, Madrid, 28911, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bueno Campana M, Olivares Ortiz J, Notario Munoz C, Ruperez Lucas M, Fernandez Rincon A, Patino Hernandez O, Calvo Rey C. High flow therapy versus hypertonic saline in bronchiolitis: randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. 2014 Jun;99(6):511-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305443. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

BronchiolitisDyspnea

Interventions

Saline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BronchitisRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiration DisordersSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Crystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Officials

  • Mercedes Bueno, MD

    Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology. Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon. Madrid. SPAIN

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2013

First Posted

June 7, 2013

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

June 7, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-06

Locations