High Flow Therapy vs Hypertonic Saline in Bronchiolitis
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is superior to hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in the treatment of moderate acute viral bronchiolitis in infants in improving respiratory distress and comfort and reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) and admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2010
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2013
CompletedJune 7, 2013
June 1, 2013
2.2 years
May 29, 2013
June 5, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in mean Respiratory Assessment Change Score (RACS) between groups in every time considered
RACS is calculated by combining 2 values: the difference between the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) score before and after treatment, plus a value of +1 for each 10% improvement (decrease) in the posttreatment respiratory rate (RR) or a value of -1 for each 10% worsening (increase) in RR.
Every 4h for three consecutive times beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study and after every 8h for three consecutive times (average of 36h)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difference in mean comfort score along the monitoring period between groups
Every 8h for 6 consecutive times (two days) beginning in the moment of inclusion in the study
Other Outcomes (2)
Length of hospital stay (LOS) in days in both groups
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days
Admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit PICU (rate) in both groups
Transfer to PICU at any time during hospitalization
Study Arms (2)
HSS (3%) + epinephrine
ACTIVE COMPARATORNebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of HSS(3%) every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.
HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)
EXPERIMENTALFlow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.
Interventions
Nebulization of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria
Nebulization 2 mL of HSS (3%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria
Precision Flow (Vapotherm Inc. Stevensville, Maryland, US ) and RT329 (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) were the dispositive used depending on the availability. Fisher and Paykel nasal cannula was used in both devices, depending on age
Nebulization of 2 mL of NS (0.9%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 6 months or less
- Moderate (Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score of 4 or greater) viral bronchiolitis (as defined by McConnockie)
- Meeting Admission criteria
You may not qualify if:
- History of prematurity
- Chronic lung disease
- Cystic fibrosis
- Congenital heart disease
- Neuromuscular disease
- Airway anomalies
- Immunodeficiency
- Those requiring immediate intubation and ventilation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922, Spain
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
Leganés, Madrid, 28911, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Bueno Campana M, Olivares Ortiz J, Notario Munoz C, Ruperez Lucas M, Fernandez Rincon A, Patino Hernandez O, Calvo Rey C. High flow therapy versus hypertonic saline in bronchiolitis: randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. 2014 Jun;99(6):511-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305443. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
PMID: 24521787DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mercedes Bueno, MD
Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology. Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon. Madrid. SPAIN
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2013
First Posted
June 7, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 7, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-06