One-Piece Le Fort I Osteotomy Versus Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy
Stability of One-Piece Le Fort I Osteotomy Versus Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Le Fort I osteotomy is often used in orthognathic surgery for patients to solve midface retrusion. It is known that post-surgical stability of Le Fort I osteotomy can be influenced by single jaw or bimaxillary procedures, fixation techniques or interpositional grafting. In patients with cleft lip and palate, the postoperative instability of Le Fort I osteotomy can be even worse due to scar tissue resulted from palate surgery. Segmental LeFort I osteotomy is another useful surgical modifications that can be easily done through the alveolar cleft. It is performed to allow the correction of differences in the occlusal planes, correction of transverse discrepancy or to facilitate an optimal occlusion. The most important benefits is that the alveolar cleft in patients who have not had alveolar bone graft surgery or failed to have successful result can be narrow down or even closed by approximation of two separating alveolar segments. However, there are limited previous studies comparing the stability of segmental versus one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy especially in patients with cleft. It is our aim to investigate whether one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy or segmental Le Fort I osteotomy can provide a better stability after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 23, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedJune 7, 2013
March 1, 2013
2.9 years
May 23, 2013
June 3, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
stability and relapse rate of surgical movement
to compare the stability and relapse rate in vertical, horizontal and transverse among two kinds of different surgical techniuques
6 months after surgery & 1-2 years till the completion of the treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Presence of pathological change of cleft-adjacent teeth
immediate after surgery, 6 months after surgery & 2 years till the completion of the treatment
Study Arms (2)
Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy
EXPERIMENTALFor some cases that bone filling over cleft site is not good enough for tooth movement, it is possible that we put them into this group which means by using Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy to approximate two dental alveolar segments.
One-piece Le Fort I Osteotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients having ideal bone graft result over cleft site, traditional One-piece Le Fort I Osteotomy will be performed.
Interventions
comparison the stability of segmental Le Fort I osteotomy with conventional approach of one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy
conventional approach
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cleft lip/palate patients
- Non growing Taiwanese adults, at least 18 years old for men and 16 years old for women
- Patients with midface retrusion and malocclusion that will need Le Fort I osteotomy
- Rigid fixation with bone plates
- Patients who signs the informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Association with craniofacial anomalies
- Patient without complete 3D imaging records including CBCT scans and digital dental models
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chang Gung Craniofacial Center
Taipei / Taoyuan, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yu Fang Liao, Ph.D.
Chang Gung Craniofacial Center , Chang Gung Memorial Hospial , Taoyuan , Taiwa
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2013
First Posted
June 7, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 7, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03