NCT01868139

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic spray cryotherapy using the CSA Medical, Inc. truFreeze System for patients with previously untreated early-stage cancer (T1a, N0, M0) who are ineligible or refuse conventional therapy including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and endoscopic resection. It is hypothesized that one of the two following outcomes will occur:

  1. 1.Complete response to therapy: complete tumor eradication confirmed through histologic examination of biopsy specimens from the targeted esophageal tissue site;
  2. 2.Stable disease: tumor remission is not attained, but disease progression is halted.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 4, 2013

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 17, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 7, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

March 30, 2013

Results QC Date

April 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

CryotherapyEsophageal cancerEsophageal carcinomaLiquid nitrogenEsophageal adenocarcinomaEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaEndoscopyAblation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Response Rate to Therapy

    The primary endpoint is to determine the response rate to spray cryotherapy. It is hypothesized that one of the two following outcomes will occur: 1. Complete response to therapy: complete tumor eradication confirmed through histologic examination of biopsy specimens from the targeted esophageal tissue site; 2. Stable disease: tumor remission is not attained, but disease progression is halted.

    5 years

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Disease-free Survival at 12 Months After Treatment

    12 months

  • Cancer Recurrence Rate at 12 Months After Treatment

    12 months

  • Estimate Overall Survival

    12 months

  • Estimate Progression-free Survival in Those Who do Not Achieve Complete Pathologic Response

    36 months

  • Number of Treatment Sessions Needed for Complete Response in Subjects in Whom the Primary Endpoint is Attained;

    12 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Cryotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy with the truFreeze device

Device: Liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy with the truFreeze device

Interventions

Low-pressure liquid nitrogen is sprayed through an upper endoscope on the diseased esophageal tissue to freeze and destroy it. The upper endoscope enables direct visualization of mucosal freeze during spray of the liquid nitrogen onto the mucosa and avoids the need for direct contact with the tissues. The target area is frozen and thawed for several consecutive cycles. The treated tissue becomes necrotic and sloughs, with new, healthy tissue regenerating in its place.

Also known as: truFreeze
Cryotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • T1aN0M0 esophageal cancer (tumor invades no deeper than lamina propria or muscularis mucosa, no regional lymph node or distant metastases), with the following minimum diagnostic workup:
  • History/physical exam within 6 weeks prior to enrollment
  • PET and CT scan of the chest and abdomen within 12 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Endoscopy with histology or cytology confirming carcinoma
  • Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with evaluation of the esophageal wall, mediastinum, and upper abdomen for evidence of abnormal lymph nodes. Suspicious lymph nodes will undergo EUS-guided fine needle aspiration if appropriate, as determined by the investigator.
  • Endoscopic resection of focal lesions with histologic confirmation of positive deep margin or residual cancer within the esophagus
  • Not a candidate for or refuses conventional therapies (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, endoscopic resection) as determined by evaluation by the investigator, discussion with the patient, and review in Thoracic or Gastrointestinal Tumor Board.
  • For females: not pregnant (negative pregnancy test within 14 days of starting study treatment), on acceptable means of contraception (oral contraceptives, barrier methods, approved contraceptive implant, long-term injectable contraception, intrauterine device or tubal ligation), or not of child bearing potential. Patients are considered not of child bearing potential if they are surgically sterile (they have undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or they are postmenopausal.
  • years of age or older
  • ECOG Performance Status 0 - 2

You may not qualify if:

  • Medically unfit or other contraindication to tolerate upper endoscopy with ablation
  • Contraindication to endoscopic spray cryotherapy as outlined in the directions for use for the device
  • Other malignancy (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) within the past 1 year
  • Co-morbid illness expected to cause death within 6 months
  • Esophageal stricture preventing passage of endoscope or catheter
  • Concurrent enrollment in an investigational drug or device trial that clinically interferes with this study's endpoints throughout the study
  • Inability to provide informed consent or comply with this protocol
  • Concurrent or previous cancer therapy for current esophageal malignancy by esophagectomy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and photodynamic therapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Greenwald BD, Dumot JA, Abrams JA, Lightdale CJ, David DS, Nishioka NS, Yachimski P, Johnston MH, Shaheen NJ, Zfass AM, Smith JO, Gill KR, Burdick JS, Mallat D, Wolfsen HC. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy for esophageal cancer: safety and efficacy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.042.

    PMID: 20363410BACKGROUND
  • Greenwald BD, et al. Spray cryotherapy for esophageal cancer: Long-term results. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:S7

    BACKGROUND
  • Greenwald BD, Dumot JA, Horwhat JD, Lightdale CJ, Abrams JA. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of endoscopic low-pressure liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy in the esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2010 Jan;23(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00991.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.

    PMID: 19515183BACKGROUND
  • Ribeiro A, et al. First report of spray cryosurgery depth of injury to the human esophagus. 2010. http://www.sages.org/meetings/annual_meeting/2010/resources/

    BACKGROUND
  • Gage AA, Baust J. Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery. Cryobiology. 1998 Nov;37(3):171-86. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1998.2115.

    PMID: 9787063BACKGROUND
  • Johnston LR, Johnston MH. Cryo Spray Ablation (CSA) in the Esophagus: Optimization of Dosimetry. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:S532-533

    BACKGROUND
  • Das A, Singh V, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK. A comparison of endoscopic treatment and surgery in early esophageal cancer: an analysis of surveillance epidemiology and end results data. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;103(6):1340-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01889.x. Epub 2008 May 28.

    PMID: 18510606BACKGROUND
  • Ell C, May A, Pech O, Gossner L, Guenter E, Behrens A, Nachbar L, Huijsmans J, Vieth M, Stolte M. Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett's cancer). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jan;65(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.033.

    PMID: 17185072BACKGROUND
  • Ell C, May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Gunter E, Mayer G, Henrich R, Vieth M, Muller H, Seitz G, Stolte M. Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2000 Apr;118(4):670-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70136-3.

    PMID: 10734018BACKGROUND
  • Overholt BF, Lightdale CJ, Wang KK, Canto MI, Burdick S, Haggitt RC, Bronner MP, Taylor SL, Grace MG, Depot M; International Photodynamic Group for High-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus. Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Oct;62(4):488-98. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.047.

    PMID: 16185958BACKGROUND
  • Overholt BF, Wang KK, Burdick JS, Lightdale CJ, Kimmey M, Nava HR, Sivak MV Jr, Nishioka N, Barr H, Marcon N, Pedrosa M, Bronner MP, Grace M, Depot M; International Photodynamic Group for High-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus. Five-year efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy with Photofrin in Barrett's high-grade dysplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Sep;66(3):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.037. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

    PMID: 17643436BACKGROUND
  • Pech O, Behrens A, May A, Nachbar L, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Manner H, Guenter E, Huijsmans J, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C. Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. 2008 Sep;57(9):1200-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.142539. Epub 2008 May 6.

    PMID: 18460553BACKGROUND
  • Prasad GA, Wu TT, Wigle DA, Buttar NS, Wongkeesong LM, Dunagan KT, Lutzke LS, Borkenhagen LS, Wang KK. Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2009 Sep;137(3):815-23. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.059. Epub 2009 Jun 12.

    PMID: 19524578BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophageal NeoplasmsAdenocarcinoma Of EsophagusEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesCarcinoma, Squamous CellCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasms, Squamous Cell

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Bruce Greenwald
Organization
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Bruce D Greenwald, MD

    University of Maryland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2013

First Posted

June 4, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

March 7, 2022

Results First Posted

October 17, 2019

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations