NCT01856673

Brief Summary

This study is a community prevention randomized trial with three parallel groups: two intervention groups and one control group in Buenaventura and Quibdó. The aim of the trial is to evaluate the impact of two community interventions on mental health; the intervention groups are designed to decrease depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorders symptoms as well as the level of dysfunctionality in Afro-Colombian victims of violence. Adult people (equal or more than 18 years old) belonging to Afro-Colombian communities in both cities will participate in the enter survey. The subjects will be selected based on the severity of symptoms, traumatic experiences and a level of dysfunction identified using the instruments of this research (i.e. those obtaining an score equal or higher than 49 in symptoms (25% of the total of symptoms)). The fieldwork and the interventions will be conducted by people belonging to the community; they are called Lay Psychosocial Community Workers (LPCW). After six (6) weeks of formal training, they will be able to perform two kinds of interventions, Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) based on a cognitive behavioral intervention and Narrative Community Group Therapy (NCGT), for the people affected by violence and displacement that were pre-selected according to the baseline instrument. The LPCW will be under the constant supervision by psychologists of the project, and under weekly supervision by a group of experts from Johns Hopkins University, the Heartland Alliance and The Institute for Research and Development in Violence Prevention and Promotion of Peaceful Coexistence Social (CISALVA) by means of phone calls or monthly visits to the cities. Selected subjects will be randomly allocated to any study branch: CETA, NCGT or the waiting control group. The study subjects will follow their allocated treatment, or waiting in the control group, for 8 to 12 weeks; then they will be re-assessed using the project instrument two weeks after the last session of therapy. The study outcome is the differences in instrument scores between the follow-up and the baseline among the interventions (CETA or NCGT) and control group. Control subjects will be assessed by the project psychologist after the follow-up, and they will receive treatment when necessary.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
521

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2012

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2012

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 14, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2013

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 28, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

April 20, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

May 14, 2013

Results QC Date

July 10, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 25, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Mental HealthDisplacementTortureViolencePost-Traumatic Stress DisorderDepressionAnxietyCommunity-based interventionPrevention trialDisabled Persons

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Score Difference in Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression and Post-traumatic Stress Disorders.

    Symptoms, ranging from 0 for "never" to 3 for "all the time" being three the worst score, were assessed with adapted versions of Hopkins Symptom Checklist and Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. Constructs of depression (n=15 symptoms), anxiety (n=10 symptoms), and post-traumatic stress symptoms (n=16 symptoms) were extracted and analyzed out of the mentioned surveys. Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25) and symptoms of trauma (PTSS) were assessed using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ). For each scale, the mean was calculated in order to use it as the measure for comparisons. Mean difference in scores of symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorders between the subject's baseline and the final assessments were calculated.

    Within the fifteen (15) days after finishing the intervention, either Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) or Narrative Community Group Therapy (NCGT). In the control group, 12 weeks after the baseline assessment.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Score Difference in Total Mental Health Symptoms (TMHS) and Dysfunction

    Within the fifteen (15) days after finishing the intervention, either Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) or Narrative Community Group Therapy (NCGT). In the control group, 12 weeks after the baseline assessment.

Study Arms (3)

ARM 1: Component-Based Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) only

Behavioral: Common Elements Treatment Approach

ARM 2: Community Group Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Narrative Community Group Therapy (NCGT) only

Behavioral: Narrative Community Group Therapy

ARM 3: Standby group

OTHER

Standby group without intervention, but under monthly monitoring.

Other: Standby group

Interventions

It was developed for treating symptoms related to violent trauma, i.e. symptoms of depression, anxiety and distress, among a population victimized by violence and torture in Colombia. The most relevant components for treatment of these 3 problematic issues were identified from literature review and a panel of experts. Descriptions and schemes have been developed in order to guarantee facility of use by community counselors who have little background in mental health skills. These counselors, who will be called Lay Psychosocial Community Workers (LPCW), will receive training in this technique before beginning of interventions. Application of this technique will be supervised constantly by mental health professionals (psychologist or social worker) from the project team.

Also known as: CETA
ARM 1: Component-Based Intervention

It consists on teaching skills to people in the community to provide mental health therapy. Therapy will be performed by LPCW under constant supervision of mental health professionals (psychologists or social workers). Sessions will begin with a series of introductory activities that motivates participants to propose different problems that they would like to solve in the group. A participant proposed a problem and he/she will be asked to talk about it. LPCW and/or psychologist will support individuals if anyone needs help to solve a psychological crisis. At the end of this narration, participants will be asked about who has had a similar situation, and how they solved it. In this way, proposed solutions will be collected by the LPCW. Finally, session closes with a motivating activity.

Also known as: NCGT
ARM 2: Community Group Therapy

Standby group: they will be assessed at baseline with the initial survey and they will wait between 10 and 12 weeks; an exit assessment will be performed with the study instrument. After the exit survey, control group participants will have an appointment with a professional psychologist to determine whether they require a mental health treatment. Those with such necessity will receive treatment in the ACOPLE center by professional psychologists or they will be referred to other health care level according to the type of psychopathology (e.g., psychosis) or its severity. Also, participants in the control group will be monitoring monthly by phone calls and if they have any psychological problem, they will be assessed in the ACOPLE center.

ARM 3: Standby group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults (18 years of age or older) Afro-Colombian victims of violence and torture who have expressed sadness, suffering psychological trauma caused by violence and when the situation was known by the leaders of Afro-Colombian Displaced Association (AFRODES) or the community leaders contacted by the research team.
  • Persons with a total symptomatic value greater than or equal to 49 points in the study instrument, with the presence of trauma from violence, and a loss of functionality score greater than zero.
  • Individuals who signed the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • People of ethnicities other than Afro-Colombian.
  • Children under 18 years old.
  • Persons who present symptoms of severe mental illness such as schizophrenia, psychotic episodes, suicidal attempters, and those who potentially could harm others.
  • Anyone who is related with the counselors (LPCW).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Centro ACOPLE de Quibdó

Quibdó, Departamento del Chocó, Colombia

Location

Centro ACOPLE de Buenaventura

Buenaventura, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Sjolund BH, Kastrup M, Montgomery E, Persson AL. Rehabilitating torture survivors. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Sep;41(9):689-96. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0426.

    PMID: 19774300BACKGROUND
  • Bisson J, Andrew M. Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub3.

    PMID: 17636720BACKGROUND
  • Kinzie JD. Psychotherapy for massively traumatized refugees: the therapist variable. Am J Psychother. 2001;55(4):475-90. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2001.55.4.475.

    PMID: 11824215BACKGROUND
  • Murray LK, Tol W, Jordans M, Zangana GS, Amin AM, Bolton P, Bass J, Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Thornicroft G. Dissemination and implementation of evidence based, mental health interventions in post conflict, low resource settings. Intervention (Amstelveen). 2014 Dec;12(Suppl 1):94-112. doi: 10.1097/WTF.0000000000000070.

  • Osorio-Cuellar GV, Pacichana-Quinayaz SG, Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Fandino-Losada A, Gutierrez-Martinez MI. Perceptions about implementation of a Narrative Community-based Group Therapy for Afro-Colombians victims of Violence. Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Sep;22(9):3045-3052. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017229.00402016.

  • Pacichana-Quinayaz SG, Osorio-Cuellar GV, Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Fandino-Losada A, Gutierrez-Martinez MI. Common Elements Treatment Approach based on a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention: implementation in the Colombian Pacific. Cien Saude Colet. 2016 Jun;21(6):1947-56. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015216.07062015.

  • Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Osorio-Cuellar GV, Pacichana-Quinayaz SG, Sanchez-Renteria G, Fandino-Losada A, Gutierrez MI. Do not forget culture when implementing mental health interventions for violence survivors. Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Sep;22(9):3053-3059. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017229.12982016.

  • Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Fandino-Losada A, Martinez-Buitrago DM, Santaella-Tenorio J, Tobon-Garcia D, Munoz-Morales EJ, Escobar-Roldan ID, Babcock L, Duarte-Davidson E, Bass JK, Murray LK, Dorsey S, Gutierrez-Martinez MI, Bolton P. A randomized controlled trial of a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention for Afro-descendants' survivors of systemic violence in Colombia. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0208483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208483. eCollection 2018.

  • Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Lim HM. A Call for Action for Mental Health: Medical Students and Physicians' roles. International Journal of Medical Students. 2015;3(3):121-122. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2015.131

    RESULT
  • Pacichana-Quinayaz SG, Osorio-Cuellar GV, Gonzalez S, Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Gutierrez-Martinez MI. Relevance of Qualitative Research Approach in Evaluating Mental Health Interventions among Victims of Violence. International Journal of Medica Students. 2015;3(3):170-171. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2015.194

    RESULT
  • Santaella-Tenorio J, Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Nieto-Gil L, Fandino-Losada A, Gutierrez-Martinez MI, Bass J, Bolton P. Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems and Needs of Violence Survivors in the Colombian Pacific Coast: A Qualitative Study in Buenaventura and Quibdo. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Dec;33(6):567-574. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000523. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

  • Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Fandino-Losada A, Martinez-Buitrago DM, Santaella-Tenorio J, Escobar-Roldan I, Tobon-Garcia D, Munoz-Morales EJ, Babcock L, Duarte-Davidson E, Murray LK, Gutierrez-Martinez MI. Mental health Narrative Community-Based Group Therapy in violence-displaced Afro-Colombians: a randomized controlled trial. Med Confl Surviv. 2023 Mar;39(1):28-47. doi: 10.1080/13623699.2023.2177951. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

  • Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Osorio-Cuellar GV, Pacichana-Quinayaz SG, Rangel-Gomez AN, Gomes-Pereira LD, Fandino-Losada A, Gutierrez-Martinez MI. Impacts of violence on the mental health of Afro-descendant survivors in Colombia. Med Confl Surviv. 2021 Jun;37(2):124-145. doi: 10.1080/13623699.2021.1938035. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticDepressionAnxiety DisordersPsychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related DisordersMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorPersonal Satisfaction

Limitations and Caveats

This study will include a subsequent follow-up to assess middle-term effects of the interventions. The proportion of participants lost to follow-up represents a limitation. The low male participation in the study did not allow for a gender subgroup.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Maria Isabel Gutierrez
Organization
CISALVA, Universidad del Valle

Study Officials

  • María Isabel Gutiérrez Martínez, MD, MSc, PhD

    CISALVA Institute of Universidad del Valle, Colombia

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Andrés Fandiño Losada, MD, MSc, PhD

    CISALVA Institute of Universidad del Valle, Colombia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Francisco Javier Bonilla Escobar, MD, MSc

    CISALVA Institute of Universidad del Valle, Colombia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Diana Milena Martínez Buitrago, MD, MSc

    CISALVA Institute of Universidad del Valle, Colombia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Julián Santaella, VMD, MSc

    CISALVA Institute of Universidad del Valle, Colombia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2013

First Posted

May 17, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion

September 1, 2013

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

April 20, 2021

Results First Posted

September 28, 2015

Record last verified: 2021-03

Locations