NCT01853332

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of individual characteristics, life stresses, and relationships over time on psychosocial outcomes (e.g. marriage, parenting, work) and physical health

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2009

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2013

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2013

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 24, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

5.3 years

First QC Date

April 30, 2013

Results QC Date

January 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Cardiovascular DiseaseDiabetesAdjustmentAdversityPsychologyMidlifeFunctioningSocioeconomicPsychosocial outcomes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Hormonal Levels

    To assess clinically significant physical health outcomes including 1) establishing risk factors for CVD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) 2) establishing novel risk factors for CVD and DM (e.g., inflammatory markers, hormonal mediators ), and 3) determining the prevalence of established CVD and DM. 1. Both insulin and glucose will be measured. 2. Adipokines. 3. Myokines. 4. Triglycerides and HDL cholesterol will be considered in light of their relevance to CVD. 5. Proinflammatory markers.

    2.5 years

  • Psychosocial Adversity

    Cumulative adversity occurring before age 18 was assessed using a) the Evaluation of Lifetime Stressors, b) SCID, and c) the Adult Attachment Interview. A cumulative adversity sum score was obtained (range 0-13, higher more).An overall adversity score was created by multiplying the number of childhood adversities×the overall severity of childhood adversity × the overall chronicity of childhood adversity. Scores for overall adversity ranged from 0 (no) to 156 more adversity).The Social Adjustment Scale is a semi-structured interview assessing functioning in the preceding 2 months and ranges from 1 (excellent) to 7 (very poor adjustment). An index score of psychosocial risk factors was created. Education less than a Bachelor's degree, unemployment, and a social adjustment scale score indicative of non-optimal functiong (≥ 3) were considered risk factors, coded as "1", and then tallied. Range of scores 0 (less)-3 (more risk).

    2.5 years

  • Psychosocial Health Risk Factors Correlated With BMI

    Correlations of scales with BMI score. Cumulative adversity occurring before age 18 was assessed using a) the Evaluation of Lifetime Stressors, b) SCID, and c) the Adult Attachment Interview. A cumulative adversity sum score was obtained (range 0-13; higher is more adversity). An overall adversity score was created by multiplying the number of childhood adversities × the overall severity of childhood adversity × the overall chronicity of childhood adversity. Scores for overall adversity ranged from 0 to 156 (higher is more adversity). The Social Adjustment Scale is a semi-structured interview assessing functioning in the preceding 2 months and ranges from 1 (excellent adjustment) to 7 (very poor adjustment). Psychosocial risk factors is an index of 1 to 3 (higher is more risk). Health risk score adds smoking, non-optimal drinking (\>7/14 drinks/week for women/men), a score in the bottom tertile of the AHEI, and minimal exercise (\<6 hours/week)and tallied (scores0-4 with higher worse).

    2.5 years

  • Social Adjustment Scale

    The Social Adjustment Scale is a semi-structured interview assessing functioning in the preceding 2 months in domains of work (including employment functioning, homemaking and other household functions, and/or student/educational functioning), friendships/leisure, and relationships with extended family. If applicable, relationships with immediate family members (spouse/partner and/or children) are also assessed. The SAS is closely linked to mental health and can be used as a tool for assessing treatment response to psychotropic medications or therapies. Positive adjustment is the ability to carry out each activity/role effectively, deriving satisfaction/support from that domain, whereas poor adjustment reflects maladaptation, dissatisfaction, disengagement, and/or discord. Scores range from 1 (excellent adjustment) to 7 (very poor adjustment). Coding was completed during an audio-recorded interview; 12% were coded for agreement (91%).

    2.5 years

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Body Mass Index (BMI)

    cross-sectional

  • Health Risk Factors

    cross-sectional

Study Arms (2)

Cross-Sectional

New participant: The purpose of the study is to learn about physical health in midlife and how it has been influenced by experiences and relationships. The study specifically targets health differences and the development of heart disease and diabetes.

Longitudinal

Former participants (or the partner of a former participant) of the Adolescent and Family Development Project, Young Adult Development Project, Across Generations Project, and/or Paths Over Time Project may already know that this research shows how people grow, individually and as part of a familial and social network, throughout the course of life. This study focuses on learning about former participants' physical health in midlife and how it has been influenced by their experiences and relationships.

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Approximately 165 former participants and 250 new participants will take part in this study at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (and Judge Baker Children's Center). The new sample will include 250 African American and Black Caribbean midlife men and women with the goal of recruiting 80% as couples. A total of 415 people will take part in this study at all study sites. Spouses and long-term significant others (with bonuses to couples for joining) will be encourage to also participate in the study. Targeting couples in this way will be parallel for the community and longitudinal samples

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female participants between 35 and 55 years of age.

You may not qualify if:

  • Abnormal hepatic function (liver function tests \>2X upper normal);
  • abnormal renal function (creatinine \>1.3 mg/dl);
  • conditions/illnesses such as active infection, significant malabsorption/malnutrition, cancer;
  • active hormonal disease such as overt hypo/hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism, hyper-cortisolism, or treatment with steroids or growth hormone.
  • Known Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) will be screened for by a detailed history and systems review.
  • Baseline laboratory analysis with chemistries, CBC, hormone levels, and EKG will be completed.
  • Original subjects with DM or CVD will not be excluded, since that would result in bias in that sample and loss of opportunity to examine predictors associated with these outcomes.
  • Community adults diagnosed with these disorders at the screening visit will be retained and referred for medical treatment as needed. In both groups, those with DM and/or CVD will be followed for psychosocial and relevant biomedical variables, excluding assessments interfered with by CVD and DM relevant medications. Those with DM and CVD will at times be separately analyzed, together with participants who develop these disorders in the years of this new study phase.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Judge Baker Children's Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ko BJ, Park KH, Shin S, Zaichenko L, Davis CR, Crowell JA, Joung H, Mantzoros CS. Diet quality and diet patterns in relation to circulating cardiometabolic biomarkers. Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;35(2):484-490. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Serum and plasma are stored to be analyzed for biomarkers related to metabolic syndrome.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetes Mellitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Christos Mantzoros
Organization
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Christos Mantzoros, MD, DSc

    Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2013

First Posted

May 15, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion

May 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

July 24, 2017

Results First Posted

July 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Locations