Imipenem Versus Cefepime in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and to Evaluate the Risk Factors for Treatment Failure
A Randomized, Comparative Open Label Study of Imipenem Versus Cefepime in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and to Evaluate the Risk Factors for Treatment Failure.
1 other identifier
interventional
175
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.All consecutive patients with Cirrhosis and ascites admitted to ILBS (Institute of Liver \& Biliary Sciences) will be evaluated for the presence of SBP (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis) by ascitic fluid examination at admission.
- 2.SBP (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis) will be diagnosed in the presence of absolute neutrophil count (ANC \>250/mm3) with/without positive ascitic fluid culture and Patients with SBP (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis) included in the study will be randomized to receive cefepime or imipenem.
- 3.However, other SBP (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis) patients not included for randomization will be given empirical therapy with 3rd generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedNovember 22, 2016
July 1, 2016
3 years
December 6, 2012
November 21, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome of the study is the Response to treatment in each intervention group. Response is defined as 25% reduction in ANC (Absolute Neutrophil Count) from baseline.
2 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Survival
15 days,1 month and 3 months
Study Arms (2)
cefepime + Albumin
EXPERIMENTALcefepime 1g iv 8 hourly + Albumin will be given for 2 days.
Imipenem + Albumin
ACTIVE COMPARATORImipenem 1g iv 8 hourly + Albumin will be given for 2 days.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Cirrhotic Patients with SBP (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis) having any of the following risk factors would be considered as 'Difficult to Treat SBP' and would be included -
- Nosocomial SBP: occurence of SBP (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis) after 48 hours of hospital admission, or
- Prior ascitic fluid infection with 3rd generation cephalosporin resistant organism, or
- No response to treatment with 3rd generation cephalosporins after 48 hours.
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 18 years.
- Cirrhotics with SBP (Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis) managed as outpatients.
- Post liver transplant, HIV patients.
- Patients on systemic chemotherapy, immunosuppressant drugs.
- Growth of bacteria resistant to intervention drugs in ascitic fluid culture.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070, India
Related Publications (1)
Jindal A, Kumar M, Bhadoria AS, Maiwall R, Sarin SK. A randomized open label study of 'imipenem vs. cefepime' in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):677-87. doi: 10.1111/liv.12985. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
PMID: 26474358DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Ankur Jindal, MD
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2012
First Posted
May 14, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07