Assessing Patient Comfort With Two Different Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solutions
Assessing Patient Comfort in Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses When Cleaned and Stored in Two Different Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solutions
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Tolerability is compared between two Multi-purpose disinfecting solutions (MPDS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2013
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedMay 29, 2013
May 1, 2013
6 months
April 24, 2013
May 25, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self-reported comfort scores with contact lens care systems
Comfort measured by questionnaires covering positive and negative attributes of contact lens wear
14 days
Study Arms (1)
RevitaLens
EXPERIMENTALAMO's RevitaLens contact lens solution
Interventions
Multi-purpose disinfecting solution
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between the ages of 18 and over inclusive.
- Males or females
- Patient is in generally good \& stable overall health.
- Patient likely to comply with study guidelines \& study visits.
- Informed consent signed.
- Are willing/able to return for all required study visits.
- Are willing/able to follow instructions from the study investigator and his/her staff.
- Have signed informed consent approved by Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee.
You may not qualify if:
- Corneal refractive surgery within 6 months of this study.
- Intra-ocular surgery within 6 months or ocular laser surgery within 6 months.
- Ocular pathology (includes glaucoma and cataract), which could impact results and/or place patient at risk.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hom, Milton M., OD, FAAOlead
- Abbott Medical Opticscollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Milton M. Hom, OD, FAAO
Azusa, California, 91702, United States
Kirk L. Smick, OD, FAAO.
Morrow, Georgia, 30260, United States
Ian Ben Gaddie, OD, FAAO.
Louisville, Kentucky, 40222, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Milton M Hom, OD FAAO
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDIV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Optometrist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2013
First Posted
May 6, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 29, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05