NCT01846975

Brief Summary

RA (rheumatoid arthritis) patients effectively treated weekly with SC (subcutaneous) Abatacept will be switched to IV (intravenous) Abatacept and restarted with SC Abatacept four after IV application. The investigators hypothesize that a switch from SC- to IV-abatacept and back in patients with low disease activity is safe and not associated with a worsening of the disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 19, 2013

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 6, 2013

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2015

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

April 19, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

AbataceptLow disease activityIntravenousSubcutaneousRheumatoid arthritis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Is switching from weekly SC injections of Abatacept to a single IV injection to cover a 4-week period an effective treatment for maintaining the disease state of patients with RA.

    Percentage of patients remaining with or less than Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS (Machold KP et al, 2003).) at Day 28. LDAS is defined as a disease activity score-28 (DAS-28 (ESR) (Prevoo ML et al, 1995)) of less than 3.2. The DAS-28 (ESR) is defined by the number of tender and swollen joints calculated from 28 joints mainly from the upper limbs, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the patient´s global assessment of disease activity (Wells, 2009).

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Is switching from SC- to IV-Abatacept and back within 1 month safe at 84 days after the IV-Abatacept treatment.

    84 days

  • Is switching from SC- to IV-Abatacept and back within 1 month safe at 168 days after the IV-Abatacept treatment.

    168 days

  • Is switching from SC- to IV-Abatacept and back within 1 month effective for maintaining the disease state of patients with RA at 84 days after the IV-Abatacept treatment.

    84 days

  • Is switching from SC- to IV-Abatacept and back within 1 month effective for maintaining the disease state of patients with RA at 168 days after the IV-Abatacept treatment.

    168 days

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical disease activity and patient related outcome parameters over the study period Does IV-Abatacept pre-exposition influence the occurrence of AEs or the evolving disease activity

    168 days

Study Arms (1)

Switch from SC to IV Abatacept and back

EXPERIMENTAL

Transition from weekly SC- to a single IV-Abatacept but also the return to weekly SC treatments after a 4 week break.

Drug: IV Abatacept

Interventions

Transition from weekly SC- to a single IV-Abatacept but also the return to weekly SC treatments after a 4 week break.

Also known as: Switch from SC to IV Abatacept and back
Switch from SC to IV Abatacept and back

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female subjects aged 18 years or older at the time of consent
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Patients classified as RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria (Aletaha D et al, 2010)
  • Patient treated with weekly SC-Abatacept for at least 3 months prior to study screening
  • Effective control of disease activity as defined by DAS-28 (ESR) \< 3.2 (LDAS)
  • Available for the whole duration of the study
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential must use maximally effective birth control during the period of therapy, must be willing to use contraception for the duration of the study (up to 168 days post the IV infusion of Abatacept). They also must have a negative pregnancy test upon entry into the study. Otherwise, female subjects must be postmenopausal (no menstrual period for a minimum of 12 months) or surgically sterile.
  • Male subjects must be surgically sterile or willing to use a double barrier contraception method upon enrolment, for the duration of the study (up to 168 days post the IV infusion of Abatacept)

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who have previously received \>2 biologic DMARDs
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women or such with a child-bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of contraception to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period (up to Day 168/Safety follow-up visit)
  • Subjects with active vasculitis of a major organ system, with the exception of rheumatoid nodules
  • Subjects with current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, or cerebral disease, whether or not related to RA and which, in the opinion of the investigator, might place a subject at unacceptable risk for participation in the study
  • Subjects with a history of cancer in the last 5 years, or with a current screening suspicious for cancer, other than non-melanoma skin cell cancers cured by local resection or carcinoma in situ
  • Subjects with evidence of active or latent bacterial (e.g. tuberculosis) or viral infections (e.g. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) at the time of potential enrolment
  • Subjects with herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) that resolved less than 2 months before the informed consent document was signed
  • Subjects who have received any live vaccines within 3 months of the anticipated first dose of study medication
  • Having participated in another drug or an interventional study within 30 days preceding the present study screening

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kantonsspital St. Gallen

Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9007, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Genovese MC, Covarrubias A, Leon G, Mysler E, Keiserman M, Valente R, Nash P, Simon-Campos JA, Porawska W, Box J, Legerton C 3rd, Nasonov E, Durez P, Aranda R, Pappu R, Delaet I, Teng J, Alten R. Subcutaneous abatacept versus intravenous abatacept: a phase IIIb noninferiority study in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):2854-64. doi: 10.1002/art.30463.

    PMID: 21618201BACKGROUND
  • Kaine J, Gladstein G, Strusberg I, Robles M, Louw I, Gujrathi S, Pappu R, Delaet I, Pans M, Ludivico C. Evaluation of abatacept administered subcutaneously in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis: impact of withdrawal and reintroduction on immunogenicity, efficacy and safety (phase Iiib ALLOW study). Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jan;71(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200344. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

    PMID: 21917824BACKGROUND
  • Keystone EC, Kremer JM, Russell A, Box J, Abud-Mendoza C, Elizondo MG, Luo A, Aranda R, Delaet I, Swanink R, Gujrathi S, Luggen M. Abatacept in subjects who switch from intravenous to subcutaneous therapy: results from the phase IIIb ATTUNE study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):857-61. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200355. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

    PMID: 22302417BACKGROUND
  • Mueller RB, Gengenbacher M, Richter S, Dudler J, Moller B, von Kempis J. Change from subcutaneous to intravenous abatacept and back in patients with rheumatoid arthritis as simulation of a vacation: a prospective phase IV, open-label trial (A-BREAK). Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Apr 14;18:88. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0985-2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Interventions

Abatacept

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImmunoconjugatesAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsSerum GlobulinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsGlobulins

Study Officials

  • Ruediger B Mueller, MD

    Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Johannes von Kempis, Prof.

    Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Oberarzt mbF

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2013

First Posted

May 6, 2013

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

January 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 4, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-03

Locations