Endoleak Repair Guided by Navigation Technology
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study is aimed at investigating whether repair of endoleak type II can be improved by adding navigation technology. Can this technology increase precision by guiding the needle that punctures through the skin as used during the repair procedure? Can the procedure logistics be improved by using navigation technology instead of computed tomography (CT) guidance of the needle puncture? Parameters logged during the procedure:
- was the needle placement successful?
- number of needle punctures?
- time used on guidance procedure
- X-ray exposure dose
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 14, 2017
March 1, 2017
5.7 years
April 26, 2013
March 10, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
detected leakage
number of patients with persistent leakage
within 1 hour after intervention
Study Arms (1)
navigation technology
EXPERIMENTALcustom made navigation technology integrated in a Siemens angiography suite for feasibility evaluation in endoleak repair procedure
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- detected endoleak
You may not qualify if:
- n/a
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Norwegian University of Science and Technologylead
- SINTEF Health Researchcollaborator
- St. Olavs Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
St Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Petter Aadahl, MD Prof
National Taiwan Normal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2013
First Posted
April 30, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03