Preoperative Cognitive Screening of Elderly Surgical Patients
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objectives of this pilot study are:
- 1.to determine whether a short cognitive test battery administered in the preadmission test center can be used to cognitively stratify elderly patients presenting for elective surgical procedures.
- 2.to evaluate the cost of cognitive screening in the preoperative testing center in terms of time and finances.
- 3.to evaluate patient perceptions about the use of preoperative cognitive screening and their outcome expectations from their surgical procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2013
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 1, 2021
CompletedApril 14, 2021
April 1, 2021
5 months
March 25, 2013
January 4, 2021
April 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients With Probable Cognitive Impairment
Potential baseline predictors of the MiniCog and CIB scores on a risk ratio scale, Clock in box 0-8, Mini-Cog 0-5, higher values represent better scores. For the Mini-cog a score of less than or equal to 2 suggests probable cognitive impairment. For the Clock in the box, a score of less than or equal to 5 suggests probable cognitive impairment. The number of participants that scored less than or equal to 2 on the Mini-cog or less than or equal to 5 on the clock in the box are presented in the data table
Cognitive stratification occurred on the date the patient consented to the study at baseline. This data was presented in a publication in 2017 (Anesthesiology. 2017 Nov;127(5):765-774.)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Cost of Cognitive Screening in Terms of Time and Finances
duration of time undergoing preoperative evaluation in minutes.
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
The data was obtained at the time of initial enrollment
Study Arms (2)
Clock in the box
Those patients with and without probable cognitive impairment based on the Clock-in-the-box assessment.
Mini-Cog
Those patients with and without probable cognitive impairment based on the Mini-Cog assessment.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
200 patients over the age of 65 that have provided informed consent will be randomly assigned to either the mini-cog or the clock in the box cognitive screen.
You may qualify if:
- Patients 65 years and over were enrolled either to be screened with the Clock in the Box or MiniCog cognitive screening tools
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under age 65 Patients with visual or hearing impairments that are not corrected Patients who do not speak and read English Patients having a formal diagnosis of dementia Patients with scheduled surgical procedures affecting the brain or cerebrovasculature (i.e. intracranial neurosurgery, carotid endarterectomy).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospitallead
- Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Deborah J. Culley, M.D., Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Angela Bader, MD, MPH
Brigham and Women's Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
James Rudolph, MD
Brigham Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Deborah J Culley, MD
Brigham Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Devon M Flaherty, MD, MPH
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2013
First Posted
April 9, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 14, 2021
Results First Posted
April 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04