NCT01825902

Brief Summary

This pilot trial studies fluorine F 18 fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) positron emission tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in planing surgery and radiation therapy and measuring response in patients with newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma. Comparing results of diagnostic procedures done before and after treatment may help doctors predict a patient's response and help plan the best treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Typical duration for early_phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2013

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2014

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 23, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

November 20, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 3, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • 18F-FLT PET activity

    The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.

    At the time of surgical resection

  • ADC values from DW-MRI

    The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.

    At the time of surgical resection

  • 18F-FDG PET activity

    The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.

    At the time of surgical resection

  • MRI contrast enhancement

    The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.

    At the time of surgical resection

  • Pathologic response

    The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.

    At the time of surgical resection

  • 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI in predicting local control, event-free survival, and overall survival, measured by therapy-induced changes in the scans

    The prognostic ability of 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI imaging will be evaluated by correlating changes in 18F-FLT uptake and ADC as treatment response both after chemotherapy (but prior to RT) and after RT with local control and survival outcomes, with the intent of establishing predictive thresholds. The results will be compared to standard prognostic factors such as change in tumor size and histopathology.

    Up to 5 years

  • Radiotherapy target volume delineation with pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI

    PET images and DW-MRI ADC maps co-registered and regions of concordance and discordance quantified for each modality as compared to pre-chemotherapy conventional MRI. The concordance correlation coefficient will be used to measure agreement between volumes generated at different times, with different modalities, and by different individuals. The measured variability associated with contrast-enhanced MRI will serve as the standard for comparison. The mean and standard deviation of volumes and their discordances will be calculated as a measure of the potential treatment impact of each modality.

    Up to 5 years

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Imaging thresholds

    Up to 1 week after completion of chemotherapy and radiation therapy

  • Efficacy of advanced imaging in accurately guiding biopsy, measured by differences in determining target location by contrast enhancement or 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI

    At the time of surgery/biopsy

  • Accuracy in distinguishing between necrosis and non-specific inflammation immediately following treatment

    Up to 5 years

  • Reduction in acute side effects based on modified RT treatment volumes with pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI as assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0

    Within 7 days after completion of RT

  • Reduction in late side effects based on modified RT treatment volumes with pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI as assessed by the NCI CTCAE 4.0 version

    Up to 5 years

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Diagnostic (18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, DW-MRI)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients undergo 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDGPET, and DW-MRI the week prior to induction therapy, within one week after the completion of induction therapy, the week prior to RT (for patients that received surgery), and within 1 week of completion of RT.

Drug: fluorine F 18 fluorothymidineRadiation: fludeoxyglucose F 18Procedure: positron emission tomographyProcedure: diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imagingOther: laboratory biomarker analysis

Interventions

Undergo 18F-FLT PET

Also known as: 18F-FLT, 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine, fluorothymidine F-18
Diagnostic (18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, DW-MRI)

Undergo 18F-FDG PET

Also known as: 18FDG, FDG
Diagnostic (18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, DW-MRI)

Undergo 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET

Also known as: FDG-PET, PET, PET scan, tomography, emission computed
Diagnostic (18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, DW-MRI)

Undergo DW-MRI

Also known as: diffusion-weighted MRI
Diagnostic (18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, DW-MRI)

Correlative studies

Diagnostic (18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, DW-MRI)

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Histological confirmation of newly diagnosed localized or newly diagnosed with metastatic Ewing sarcoma (ES) or primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of bone or soft tissue
  • Planning to receive definitive RT or surgery with or without adjuvant RT
  • Willing to sign release of information for any follow-up records
  • Provide informed written consent if \>= 18 years; if \< 18 years, provide informed written assent and parent or legal guardian provide informed written consent
  • Patients must have measurable disease
  • Willingness to participate in mandatory imaging studies
  • Willingness to provide mandatory pathology samples for correlative research

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to undergo MRI scans with contrast (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, kidney failure)
  • Unable to undergo 18F-FLT PET scan
  • Any of the following:
  • Pregnant women
  • Nursing women
  • Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive, Peripheral

Interventions

alovudineFluorodeoxyglucose F18Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy2-phenyl-6-(2'-(4'-(ethoxycarbonyl)thiazolyl))thiazolo(3,2-b)(1,2,4)triazole

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveNeoplasms, NeuroepithelialNeuroectodermal TumorsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms, Nerve Tissue

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DeoxyglucoseDeoxy SugarsCarbohydratesSpectrum AnalysisChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Nadia N. Laack, M.D.

    Mayo Clinic

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2013

First Posted

April 8, 2013

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

January 1, 2014

Study Completion

November 23, 2015

Last Updated

November 20, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-03

Locations