NCT01822574

Brief Summary

This research was performed to determine which of the three techniques used by knee surgeons at the Mayo Clinic was the most accurate at the surgical removal (resection) of the knee-cap (patella) in a symmetric fashion during total knee replacement (arthroplasty). Although all three techniques are known to be effective, the three techniques had never been compared to one another to determine if one was more effective than the others at resecting the patella.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2013

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2013

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 2, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2016

Status Verified

February 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

March 18, 2013

Results QC Date

February 3, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 3, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean Asymmetry of the Patella After Patella Resection

    Post-resection symmetry of the patella was independently assessed by a resident or fellow who was not involved in the resection. This was evaluated by dividing the patella into four equal quadrants and measuring the thickness in the center of each quadrant using a ring tipped or "C"-shaped caliper. The difference between the thickest and thinnest measurements of the patella was reported as the value of asymmetry.

    approximate average surgery time of 3 hours

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The Difference Between Surgeon Goal and Actual Resection Height

    Time 0 (prior to patella resection), and after surgery (approximately 3 hours)

  • Time to Complete Patella Resurfacing

    Time 0 (prior to patella resection), and after surgery (approximately 3 hours)

Study Arms (3)

Cutting Guide Technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The guide is clamped onto the patella and tightened so that it remains stable. The guide has a slot that allows insertion of a standard sagittal saw blade, and this slot guides the blade as it is advanced across the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Procedure: Cutting Guide Technique

Haptic Feedback Technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

It consists of a free hand cut (no guide used) with a standard sagittal saw that is oriented based on osteo-cartilaginous landmarks and haptic palpation of the patella by the surgeon. The resection thickness/obliquity can be altered based on haptic feedback (use of the sense of touch) of the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Procedure: Haptic Feedback Technique

Four Quadrant Technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Resection is performed in a free handed fashion, but after resection, the thickness of the patella is measured separately in all four quadrants (superolateral, superomedial, inferomedial, and inferolateral). Additional resection is performed as needed based on the quadrant measurements and the measurements are repeated after each resection until satisfactory resection thickness and symmetry are obtained.

Procedure: Four Quadrant Technique

Interventions

The guide is clamped onto the patella and tightened so that it remains stable. The guide has a slot that allows insertion of a standard sagittal saw blade, and this slot guides the blade as it is advanced across the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Cutting Guide Technique

It consists of a free hand cut (no guide used) with a standard sagittal saw that is oriented based on osteo-cartilaginous landmarks and haptic palpation of the patella by the surgeon. The resection thickness/obliquity can be altered based on haptic feedback (use of the sense of touch) of the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Haptic Feedback Technique

Resection is performed in a free handed fashion, but after resection, the thickness of the patella is measured separately in all four quadrants (superolateral, superomedial, inferomedial, and inferolateral). Additional resection is performed as needed based on the quadrant measurements and the measurements are repeated after each resection until satisfactory resection thickness and symmetry are obtained.

Four Quadrant Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty with planned patellar resection by one of the three staff surgeons included in the study.
  • Patient must be able and willing to provide consent for study participation

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient in need of revision total knee arthroplasty or having already undergone prior total knee arthroplasty
  • Patient not in need of patellar resection during their primary total knee arthroplasty
  • Unwilling or unable to provide consent for participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Camp CL, Martin JR, Krych AJ, Taunton MJ, Spencer-Gardner L, Trousdale RT. Resection Technique Does Affect Resection Symmetry and Thickness of the Patella During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 May 29.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Knee Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Robert T. Trousdale, M.D.
Organization
Mayo Clinic

Study Officials

  • Robert Trousdale, MD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2013

First Posted

April 2, 2013

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 2, 2016

Results First Posted

March 2, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations