Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques to Achieve Patella Symmetry During Resection
Effect of Surgical Technique on Resection Symmetry of the Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research was performed to determine which of the three techniques used by knee surgeons at the Mayo Clinic was the most accurate at the surgical removal (resection) of the knee-cap (patella) in a symmetric fashion during total knee replacement (arthroplasty). Although all three techniques are known to be effective, the three techniques had never been compared to one another to determine if one was more effective than the others at resecting the patella.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 2, 2016
CompletedMarch 2, 2016
February 1, 2016
2.8 years
March 18, 2013
February 3, 2016
February 3, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Asymmetry of the Patella After Patella Resection
Post-resection symmetry of the patella was independently assessed by a resident or fellow who was not involved in the resection. This was evaluated by dividing the patella into four equal quadrants and measuring the thickness in the center of each quadrant using a ring tipped or "C"-shaped caliper. The difference between the thickest and thinnest measurements of the patella was reported as the value of asymmetry.
approximate average surgery time of 3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The Difference Between Surgeon Goal and Actual Resection Height
Time 0 (prior to patella resection), and after surgery (approximately 3 hours)
Time to Complete Patella Resurfacing
Time 0 (prior to patella resection), and after surgery (approximately 3 hours)
Study Arms (3)
Cutting Guide Technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe guide is clamped onto the patella and tightened so that it remains stable. The guide has a slot that allows insertion of a standard sagittal saw blade, and this slot guides the blade as it is advanced across the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.
Haptic Feedback Technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORIt consists of a free hand cut (no guide used) with a standard sagittal saw that is oriented based on osteo-cartilaginous landmarks and haptic palpation of the patella by the surgeon. The resection thickness/obliquity can be altered based on haptic feedback (use of the sense of touch) of the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.
Four Quadrant Technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORResection is performed in a free handed fashion, but after resection, the thickness of the patella is measured separately in all four quadrants (superolateral, superomedial, inferomedial, and inferolateral). Additional resection is performed as needed based on the quadrant measurements and the measurements are repeated after each resection until satisfactory resection thickness and symmetry are obtained.
Interventions
The guide is clamped onto the patella and tightened so that it remains stable. The guide has a slot that allows insertion of a standard sagittal saw blade, and this slot guides the blade as it is advanced across the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.
It consists of a free hand cut (no guide used) with a standard sagittal saw that is oriented based on osteo-cartilaginous landmarks and haptic palpation of the patella by the surgeon. The resection thickness/obliquity can be altered based on haptic feedback (use of the sense of touch) of the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.
Resection is performed in a free handed fashion, but after resection, the thickness of the patella is measured separately in all four quadrants (superolateral, superomedial, inferomedial, and inferolateral). Additional resection is performed as needed based on the quadrant measurements and the measurements are repeated after each resection until satisfactory resection thickness and symmetry are obtained.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty with planned patellar resection by one of the three staff surgeons included in the study.
- Patient must be able and willing to provide consent for study participation
You may not qualify if:
- Patient in need of revision total knee arthroplasty or having already undergone prior total knee arthroplasty
- Patient not in need of patellar resection during their primary total knee arthroplasty
- Unwilling or unable to provide consent for participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Publications (1)
Camp CL, Martin JR, Krych AJ, Taunton MJ, Spencer-Gardner L, Trousdale RT. Resection Technique Does Affect Resection Symmetry and Thickness of the Patella During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 May 29.
PMID: 26115983RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert T. Trousdale, M.D.
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Trousdale, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2013
First Posted
April 2, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 2, 2016
Results First Posted
March 2, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share