NCT02648971

Brief Summary

This randomized, controlled clinical trial will compare the outcomes of single portal versus two portal techniques in patients who have meniscus or articular cartilage pathology. The study hypothesis is that patients who undergo single portal arthroscopy will have less pain post-operatively, use less pain medication, and have a higher International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at six months and one year compared to patients who undergo traditional two portal knee arthroscopy.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2015

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2016

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2018

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 30, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

December 15, 2015

Results QC Date

October 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

kneearthroscopyportalmeniscuscartilage injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) Score

    IKDC subjective knee evaluation form scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).

    Baseline

  • IKDC Score

    IKDC subjective knee evaluation form scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).

    30 days

  • IKDC Score

    IKDC subjective knee evaluation form scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).

    3 Months

  • IKDC Score

    IKDC subjective knee evaluation form scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).

    6 Months

  • IKDC Score

    IKDC subjective knee evaluation form scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).

    12 Months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain Levels

    Days 1 and 4

  • Number of Participants That Required the Use of Pain Medication

    Days 1 and 4

  • Number of Participants That Required the Use of Narcotics

    Days 1 and 4

Study Arms (2)

Single Portal Knee Arthroscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After randomization for each patient is complete, the website will document the name of the person who logged on to perform the randomization, the date and time of the log in, and the surgical group assignment for each patient. This randomization information will be forwarded to the operating room staff so that they can prepare for each study participant's surgical procedure. Patients in Group 1 will undergo knee arthroscopy using a single portal. The details of the surgical procedure for each study participant will be documented on the IKDC Surgical Documentation Form. Study participants in each group will return for standard post-operative follow-up visits at one week, 30 days, and three months. They will return to the clinic at six months and one year for study visits.

Procedure: Single Portal Knee Arthroscopy

Two Portal Knee Arthroscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in Group 2 will undergo knee arthroscopy using two portals. The details of the surgical procedure for each study participant will be documented on the IKDC Surgical Documentation Form. Study participants in each group will return for standard post-operative follow-up visits at one week, 30 days, and three months. They will return to the clinic at six months and one year for study visits.

Procedure: Two Portal Knee Arthroscopy

Interventions

Patients in Group 1 will undergo knee arthroscopy using a single portal.

Single Portal Knee Arthroscopy

Patients in Group 2 will undergo knee arthroscopy using two portals.

Two Portal Knee Arthroscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men and women between 21 and 65 years of age, who agree to comply with the protocol
  • Patients undergoing a primary knee arthroscopy procedure for meniscus or articular cartilage pathology

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a history of long term pain medication use and/or chronic pain conditions unrelated to the surgery.
  • Subjects with severe renal disease, allergies to pain medication, and subjects that will have adverse drug-drug reactions from prescribed pain medication.
  • Patients with previous reconstructive procedures, lateral retinacular release, or microfracture
  • Active knee infection or sepsis at the time of surgery
  • Meniscal injuries requiring repair
  • Ligamentous instability
  • Advanced degenerative or inflammatory arthritis
  • Known cancer at the time of surgery
  • Conditions that might interfere with recovery from knee arthroscopy (i.e. conditions or diseases of the nervous and/or muscular system, vascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes)
  • Malignant tumor history or treatment of malignant tumor of the knee
  • Lower extremity condition causing abnormal ambulation (e.g. ankle fusion, ankle arthroplasty, previous hip fracture, knee arthrofibrosis)
  • Pregnant, breast feeding, or planning on becoming pregnant during the time frame of the study, (if a woman of child-bearing age)
  • Emotional or neurological conditions that affect the subject's ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness or drug and/or alcohol abuse
  • Severely overweight (BMI \>40) at study enrollment or surgery
  • Currently participating in another research study
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):600-13. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290051301.

    PMID: 11573919BACKGROUND
  • van de Graaf VA, Wolterbeek N, Scholtes VA, Mutsaerts EL, Poolman RW. Reliability and Validity of the IKDC, KOOS, and WOMAC for Patients With Meniscal Injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1408-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546514524698. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

    PMID: 24618098BACKGROUND
  • Cooper DE, Fouts B. Single-portal arthroscopy: report of a new technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2013 Jul 19;2(3):e265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2013.02.017. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 24265996BACKGROUND
  • Crawford K, Briggs KK, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the IKDC score for meniscus injuries of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2007 Aug;23(8):839-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.005.

    PMID: 17681205BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Knee Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. John Hubbard
Organization
Wake Forest University

Study Officials

  • Beth P. Smith, PhD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • John Hubbard

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2015

First Posted

January 7, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 31, 2018

Study Completion

May 31, 2018

Last Updated

December 30, 2020

Results First Posted

December 30, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations