RCT Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of 4 Therapeutic Strategies Based on 4 Different Major Opioids (Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Buprenorphine vs Morphine) in Cancer Patients With Moderate/Severe Pain, at the Moment of Starting 3rd Step of WHO Analgesic Ladder.
CERP
1 other identifier
interventional
518
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Pain, in neoplastic disease, is a symptom with severe negative impact on the quality of life of patients and a high incidence, with values around 70-90% in advanced and metastatic stages. Than 20 years the main reference for the pharmacological treatment of cancer pain are the guidelines produced by the World Health Organization (WHO). This document shows that the use of opioid drugs is the mainstay of treatment, with particular reference to opioids "major" (3 rd step of the analgesic ladder). The 4 opioids more most commonly prescribed in Italy (oral morphine and oxycodone, fentanyl and buprenorphine transdermal), based on the data currently available, have an analgesic effect would partly overlap but with different percentages of non-responders (NR), a different need to increase the dose over time to maintain adequate analgesia, a different action to the switch to another molecule for ineffectiveness analgesic. The observations described suggest that opioids, although they belong to the same family drug may not be fully comparable with regard to the clinical effects products. Important differences are known on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic and, more recently, also in terms of pharmacogenomics. This is a comparative study of analgesic strategies based on the use of the 4 mentioned opioids, going to look for possible differences in terms of analgesic efficacy, changes in dose over time, use of switch or permanent abandonment of treatment, parallel to the contour of the side effects. The associated sub-project will link the structure gene of patients and clinical results have emerged.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 cancer
Started Apr 2011
Typical duration for phase_4 cancer
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 20, 2015
CompletedDecember 24, 2015
October 1, 2015
3.5 years
March 8, 2013
October 20, 2015
November 20, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Non-Responder (NR) Participants
Evaluation of the proportion of Non-Responder (NR) participants. NR correspond to the subjects who do not report any analgesic effects, with a P.I.D. (pain intensity difference) from visit 6 and visit 1 =/\< 0%, (using a 0-10 NRS ). It includes the situations of average pain intensity "stable" or "worsened" at day 28 compared with baseline values.
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Full-responder
28 days
Other Outcomes (1)
The Opioid Escalation Index
28 days
Study Arms (4)
Morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATOROxycodone
EXPERIMENTALBuprenorphine
EXPERIMENTALFentanyl
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with diagnostic (histological or cytological) evidence of locally advanced or metastatic solid tumour;
- with average pain intensity ≥ 4, measured with NRS and related to the last 24 hours, due to the cancer, requiring for the first time an analgesic treatment with 3rd step/WHO opioids
- with life expectancy \> one month
- "strong" opioid naïve;
- eligible to take any of the medications under evaluation, by TDS or by mouth;
- with age ≥ 18 years;
You may not qualify if:
- Patients recruited in other researches that conflict or may confound the conduction and results of the present study;
- Lack of informed consent;
- with presence of other diseases, including psychiatric/mental illness, severe senile or other form of dementia, that can interfere with participation and compliance with the study protocol or can contraindicate the use of the investigational drugs;
- with presence of co-morbidities, which could create potentially dangerous drug interactions with opioids (eg, use of macrolide antibiotics or antifungal,….);
- any kind of contraindications to the use of opioid drugs;
- Patients with a known story, past or current, of drugs abuse or addiction;
- Use of drugs which presents a combination of opioids and other molecule (as NSAIDs, paracetamol, naloxone, ..);
- Patients who cannot guarantee regular follow-up visits for logistic or geographic reasons;
- Need of starting 3rd step treatment in an "emergency clinical situation" that do not allow the correct procedures of randomization;
- diagnosis of primary brain tumor or leukaemia;
- diagnosis of chronic renal failure;
- patients with antalgic radiotherapy or radio-metabolic therapy in progress or completed less than 14 days before study;
- patients starting a first line chemotherapy simultaneously to the beginning of the study;
- other types of analgesic treatments, including local-regional anesthetic techniques or neurosurgical /ablative methods.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Ospedale S. Marta
Catania, Italy, Italy
Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, Italy, Italy
Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele
Milan, Italy, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Valtellina-Valchiavenna
Morbegno, Italy, Italy
Multimedica
Sesto San Giovanni, Italy, Italy
Ospedale Gradenigo
Torino, Italy, Italy
Ospedale Civile di Piacenza
Piacenza, Piacenza, 29100, Italy
Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova Azienda Ospedaliera
Reggio Emilia, RE, 42100, Italy
Ospedale San Giovanni Battista di Torino
Torino, Torino, 10126, Italy
Related Publications (7)
Apolone G, Bertetto O, Caraceni A, Corli O, De Conno F, Labianca R, Maltoni M, Nicora M, Torri V, Zucco F; Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group. Pain in cancer. An outcome research project to evaluate the epidemiology, the quality and the effects of pain treatment in cancer patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Feb 2;4:7. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-7.
PMID: 16457716BACKGROUNDApolone G, Corli O, Caraceni A, Negri E, Deandrea S, Montanari M, Greco MT; Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group (CPOR SG) Investigators. Pattern and quality of care of cancer pain management. Results from the Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group. Br J Cancer. 2009 May 19;100(10):1566-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605053. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
PMID: 19401688BACKGROUNDGreco MT, Corli O, Montanari M, Deandrea S, Zagonel V, Apolone G; Writing Protocol Committee; Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group (CPOR SG) Investigators. Epidemiology and pattern of care of breakthrough cancer pain in a longitudinal sample of cancer patients: results from the Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group. Clin J Pain. 2011 Jan;27(1):9-18. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181edc250.
PMID: 20842024BACKGROUNDApolone G, Deandrea S, Montanari M, Corli O, Greco MT, Cavuto S. Evaluation of the comparative analgesic effectiveness of transdermal and oral opioids in cancer patients: a propensity score analysis. Eur J Pain. 2012 Feb;16(2):229-38. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00020.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
PMID: 22323375BACKGROUNDCorli O, Montanari M, Deandrea S, Greco MT, Villani W, Apolone G. An exploratory analysis on the effectiveness of four strong opioids in patients with cancer pain. Pain Med. 2012 Jul;13(7):897-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01408.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PMID: 22680789BACKGROUNDCorli O, Roberto A, Bennett MI, Galli F, Corsi N, Rulli E, Antonione R. Nonresponsiveness and Susceptibility of Opioid Side Effects Related to Cancer Patients' Clinical Characteristics: A Post-Hoc Analysis. Pain Pract. 2018 Jul;18(6):748-757. doi: 10.1111/papr.12669. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
PMID: 29220110DERIVEDCorli O, Floriani I, Roberto A, Montanari M, Galli F, Greco MT, Caraceni A, Kaasa S, Dragani TA, Azzarello G, Luzzani M, Cavanna L, Bandieri E, Gamucci T, Lipari G, Di Gregorio R, Valenti D, Reale C, Pavesi L, Iorno V, Crispino C, Pacchioni M, Apolone G; CERP STUDY OF PAIN GROUP (List of collaborators). Are strong opioids equally effective and safe in the treatment of chronic cancer pain? A multicenter randomized phase IV 'real life' trial on the variability of response to opioids. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1107-1115. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw097. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
PMID: 26940689DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Oscar Corli
- Organization
- Mario Negri Institution
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oscar Corli, MD
Mario Negri Institute of Pharmacological Research - IRCCS
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2013
First Posted
March 12, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 24, 2015
Results First Posted
November 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10