Facet Versus Trigger Point Injections for Chronic Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A) Background Chronic neck pain is a significant and common issue which is difficult to treat. Tight bands of muscle (trigger points) can be a source of chronic neck pain and they are sometimes injected to manage chronic neck pain. However, these injections seldom lead to significant, long-lasting relief. In some cases, these trigger points may originate from injury or damage to a specific joint in the neck (the facet joint). Treatment of this joint with cortisone injection may lead to improved pain relief and function. B) Hypothesis By injecting the facet joint with cortisone, the pain associated with tight bands of muscle in the neck and shoulders will be relieved to a greater extent than that attained through trigger point injection. C) Methods Patients with neck pain will have a test to determine if any pain originates from the facet joint. Among those who have significant pain from these joints, a comparison between the effect of cortisone injection into these joints versus injection into the trigger points will be evaluated. D) Expected Results and Significance It is expected that injection with cortisone into the facet joints will lead to improved pain and function when compared to that attained from trigger point injection. In addition, the number of trigger points, and the pain and headache that originate from these trigger points, are expected to decrease with cortisone injection into the facets to a statistically and clinically significant extent. Results from this pilot study will then influence the design of future trials into chronic neck pain treatment, leading to better clinical recommendations. A peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations will facilitate dissemination.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2013
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedDecember 17, 2018
December 1, 2018
3.6 years
March 7, 2013
December 13, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
A 15-point self-report scale ranging from 0 = A very great deal worse to 15 = A very great deal better (8 = no change).
1, 3, and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale
1, 3, and 6 months
Neck Disability Index
1, 3, and 6 months
Headache Impact Test - 6
1, 3, and 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9
1, 3, and 6 months
Adverse Events Checklist
1, 3, and 6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Dexamethasone
EXPERIMENTALIntra-articular corticosteroid number 2.
Betamethasone
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive either betamethasone or dexamethasone injected into the cervical facet joints (levels determined by experienced physician).
Intramuscular injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this group will receive lidocaine injection directly into tender myofascial trigger points.
Home exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this group will receive education and a pamphlet on a set of standardized home exercises for neck pain
Interventions
6 mg/mL injected into the facet joint as dictated by modified dual-comparative medial branch block diagnostic protocol
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- between 18 and 65 years of age and able to speak and understand conversational English
- Primary diagnosis of chronic (\>6 months) mechanical / myofascial neck pain
You may not qualify if:
- Those with significant cognitive decline or cognitive interference (as identified by the physician) will be excluded, as will those who have received radiofrequency ablation of any cervical nerve within the past year, intra-articular cortisone facet injection within the past 4 months, trigger point injection into the cervical/shoulder girdle muscles within the past 4 months, or the presence of any known contraindication to injection (Attachments).
- Women who are or may be pregnant (based on last menstruation) will be excluded.
- Finally, for the purposes of this pilot study, those currently involved in active litigation regarding the neck pain will be excluded. Those with active worker's compensation claims or currently receiving salary indemnity benefits through motor vehicle insurance providers will be included, as they represent a significant proportion of this population.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Joseph's Hospital / Parkwood Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David M Walton, BScPT, PhD
Western University, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2013
First Posted
March 11, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12