Comparison of DBS Targets in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
PRESTOC2
Comparison of the Efficacy of Subthalamic Nucleus, Caudate Nucleus and Nucleus Accumbens Electric Stimulation in Severe and Resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder.
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed for severe and resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. This electrical stimulation has been tested on, and shown to be effective at, different targets (subthalamic nucleus, caudate nucleus \& nucleus accumbens). However, the efficacies of each target have never been compared directly. This protocol aims to do so, with the hypothesis that subthalamic (STN) stimulation will be more efficacious.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedMay 18, 2016
April 1, 2015
5.3 years
January 25, 2013
May 17, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Severity of symptoms after each phase
Severity as measured by the Yale-Brown Obsession and Compulsion scale
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Severity of symptoms after each phase
month 0
Severity of symptoms after each phase
6 months
Severity of symptoms after each phase
10 months
Severity of symptoms after each phase
14 months
Study Arms (3)
Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus
EXPERIMENTALPose of bilateral subthalamic and caudate stimulating macroelectrodes with subclavicular pacemaker.Stimulation of subthalamic nucleus
Deep brain stimulation of caudate nucleus
EXPERIMENTALPose of bilateral subthalamic and caudate stimulating macroelectrodes with subclavicular pacemaker. Caudate nucleus stimulation
Deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens
EXPERIMENTALPose of bilateral subthalamic and caudate stimulating macroelectrodes with subclavicular pacemaker.Nucleus accumbens stimulation.
Interventions
Pose of bilateral subthalamic and caudate stimulating macroelectrodes with subclavicular pacemaker.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 - 60
- OCD according to DSM IV, at least 5 years since diagnosis
- Severe OCD responsible for a clinically significant and objective alteration of psychosocial functioning and suffering: YBOCS score\>25, CGI score \>= 4 and EGF score \<= 40
- Resistance of OCD to at least 3 antidepressants from the serotonin reuptake inhibitors category, including clomipramine, given for at least 12 weeks with doses of at least 80mg/d for fluoxetine, 300mg/d for fluvoxamine, 200mg/d for sertraline, 60mg/d for paroxetine and citalopram, 250mg/d for clomipramine). Plus resistance to each of these 3 antidepressant associated first to risperidone or pimozide for a month then to Lithium carbonate, clonazepam, buspirone or pindolol for a month
- Resistance to at least 2 behavioural and cognitive therapies conducted by as many different specialists, following validated protocols (e.g. exposition and prevention of response)
- Oral and written knowledge of French
- Social security coverage
- Written consent of the patient after clear description of the study
You may not qualify if:
- cognitive alteration with PM38 score \< IQ85
- Other axis 1 disorder according to DSM IV, excepted, global anxiety disorder, social phobia, nicotine dependance, and antecedent of major depressive episodes
- suicidal risk \>=2 on item 10 of MADRS (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale)
- Personality disorder (axis 2 of DSM IV assessed using the SCID II)
- Contra indication to MRI, abnormal brain MRI, other severe intercurrent disease
- Fertile woman without adequate contraception
- Pregnancy
- Forced psychiatric hospitalisation
- Any kind of legal protection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre d'investigation Clinique Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, 75013, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luc Mallet, MD, PhD
Assitance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2013
First Posted
March 8, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share