Return to Work: Promoting Health and Productivity in Workers With Common Mental Disorders
SAFARI
SAFARI-Return to Work: Promoting Health and Productivity in Workers With Common Mental Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
352
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evidence-based clinical treatments for common mental disorders, such as CBT and/or pharmacotherapy, have resulted in significant and sustained improvement in clinical symptoms. However, the individual-focused treatments rarely have sickness absence as a target of intervention or evaluate work-related outcomes, such as return to work. A recent review of the evidence for managing stress at work showed that individual interventions give effects on mental health measures but did not impact absenteeism at work. The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two different rehabilitation models, one based on psychotherapy and the other on workplace-interventions, when these are offered as standalone interventions and in combination for patients with adjustment, anxiety and depressive disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 21, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.6 years
February 19, 2013
March 18, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Return to work
Primary outcome measure is RTW based on register data on number of sick leave days from the National Insurance Office (NIO), self-reported data regarding short-term absence (periods of less than 14 days, that is not registered at NIO) and self-reported work ability according to scores in the Work Ability Index (WAI). The primary outcome will be reported as change over time from inclusion and at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months.
at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Changes in symptom severity of depression
at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months
Changes in symptom severity of anxiety
at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months
Changes in score of burnout symptoms
at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months
Changes in scores of General function
at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months
Changes in scores of general satisfaction with life
at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months
Study Arms (4)
ACT
EXPERIMENTALThe ACT intervention consists of 6 manual-based face-to-face sessions and internet-based homework modules. The manual is based on the six core processes in the ACT-model: acceptance, mindfulness, defusion, self as context, values and committed action.
WPI
EXPERIMENTALThis interventions aims at the facilitation of dialogue between the participant and the workplace through a series of steps consisting of individual interviews with the participant and his/her nearest supervisor and a so called "convergence dialogue meeting" in order to agree upon short- and long-term solutions.
ACT and WPI
EXPERIMENTALThe study participants receive both ACT and WPI. The ACT intervention consists of 6 manual-based face-to-face sessions and internet-based homework modules. The manual is based on the six core processes in the ACT-model: acceptance, mindfulness, defusion, self as context, values and committed action. WPI aims at the facilitation of dialogue between the participant and the workplace through a series of steps consisting of individual interviews with the participant and his/her nearest supervisor and a so called "convergence dialogue meeting" in order to agree upon short- and long-term solutions.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONTreatment as usual (TAU) which means that the participant continues in ordinary health care and does not receive interventions other than the initial assessment.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Employment grade at 50% minimum. On Sick-leva for at least 1-12 moths due to adjustment, anxiety or depressive disorders.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with addiction disorders, schizophrenia, psychotic disorders high suicidal risk, bipolar disorder, severe depression or generalized anxiety disorder. Patients on current psychotherapy. Patients that do not speak and write Swedish.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutetlead
- Region Stockholmcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
FORUM-Centrum för psykiatrforskning, Danderyds sjukhus
Stockholm, 182 88, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Finnes A, Ghaderi A, Dahl J, Nager A, Enebrink P. Randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and a workplace intervention for sickness absence due to mental disorders. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):198-212. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000097. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
PMID: 28956942DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Nager, MD, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2013
First Posted
March 6, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03