Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
SIOver
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the treatment with single implant overdenture for the edentulous mandible. The investigators hypothesize that treatment with lower overdenture retained by a single implant appears to have satisfactory effectiveness as a treatment for patients with specific conditions (such as maladaptive patients), with the advantages of simplicity and greater immediate benefits when compared to the conventional full denture, improving the retention and stability of the denture and better oral-related quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedMarch 16, 2016
March 1, 2016
1.5 years
February 25, 2013
March 14, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oral health-related quality of life impacts
Oral health related quality of life impacts were measured using the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous subjects (Souza et al., 2007; Souza et al., 2010), considering the overall scale and its four different scale domains: masticatory discomfort and disability (four items), (2) psychological discomfort and disability (five items), social disability (five items) and oral pain and discomfort (five items).
Change from baseline on oral health-related quality of life impacts at 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction with dentures
Change from baseline on satisfaction with dentures at 12 months
Other Outcomes (3)
Primary stability
Changes from baseline on primary stability of implants at 12 months
Crestal bone loss
Changes from baseline on crestal bone loss at 12 months
Bone density around the implant
Changes from baseline on bone density around the implant at 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Conventional implant loading protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle implant-retained mandibular overdenture
Immediate loading implant protocol
EXPERIMENTALSingle implant-retained mandibular overdenture
Interventions
60 patients treated with single implant retained complete mandibular denture (overdenture) opposed to a conventional maxillary denture, allocated into 2 experimental groups according to the implant loading protocol (conventional and immediate), evaluated at baseline and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Fully edentulous patients
- Need of replacement of the mandibular denture or patient without mandibular denture
- Patients with poor adaptation to the mandibular denture
- Patients with good general health
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to receive a conventional dentures opposed to a mandibular overdenture retained by a single implant
- Patients with local intraoral diseases that influence denture stability, retention and adaptation of the lower denture (such as changes or anatomical deformations of the jaws, mucosal changes caused by fungi and bacteria, tumor changes and absolute xerostomia)
- Patients with systemic, psychological or neurological diseases that preclude or hinder oral movements of the patient for clinical care and/or clinical follow-up in all stages of the research
- Patients who choose other treatment modalities not covered by the study
- Patients with alcoholism or other severe behavioral disorders that compromise their participation in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias
Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-220, Brazil
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claudio R Leles, DDS, PhD
Universidade Federal de Goias
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2013
First Posted
March 1, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03