Home Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home Monitoring Versus Hospitalization in Mild Non-Alcoholic Acute Interstitial Pancreatitis
1 other identifier
observational
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is considered a disease requiring in-hospital treatment. We studied the feasibility of home management in AP.The aim of study was to compare 30 day readmission rates in patients with mild non-alcoholic acute pancreatitis (NAAP) randomized to home monitoring versus hospitalization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2013
CompletedFebruary 22, 2013
February 1, 2013
7 months
February 19, 2013
February 21, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome of the study was the 30 day hospital readmission rate.
30 day hospital readmission of home and hospital groups of patients were evaluated.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Other outcomes evaluated included the duration of abdominal pain and time to resumption of an oral diet, both measured in hours from the time of presentation.
hours
Study Arms (1)
Home and hospital treatment groups
Patients were randomized into either home or hospital groups after a brief hospitalization(≤24 hours. Hospital patients were followed 5 days in hospital.Home patients were visited on 2nd,3rd and 5th days by a staff nurse and the vital signs, symptoms, and general condition were recorded and transmitted back to the attending physician. On the 7th, 14th and 30th days, the home and hospital group patients were requested to return for a follow-up clinic visit at Bezmialem, at which time an assessment of their symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory evaluation was conducted.
Eligibility Criteria
Mild acute non-alhololic patients managed in home.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of AP based on 2 out of 3 findings: characteristic abdominal pain, amylase and/or lipase levels ≥3 times the upper limit of normal, and/or abdominal imaging demonstrating changes of acute pancreatitis
- Presentation within 48 hours of symptom onset
- Imrie's scores of ≤5 and HAP score ≤2 within 24 hours of presentation to the hospital
- Lack of hemoconcentration (hematocrit ≥44%) on presentation since hemoconcentration has been shown to be a risk factor for pancreatic necrosis.
You may not qualify if:
- The presence of organ failure by the Atlanta criteria on the first day of presentation
- The presence of clinical signs and/or symptoms of sepsis
- Alcoholic acute pancreatitis
- A history of abdominal imaging demonstrating a dilated pancreatic duct and/or pancreatic calcifications
- Coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1, and/or platelet count \<50,000/mm3
- Comorbidities requiring hospitalization regardless of the presence of AP e.g. acute myocardial infarction, malignancy, cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, and chronic pulmonary disease)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bezmialem Vakıf University Hospital, Gastroenterology Clinic
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Whitlock TL, Repas K, Tignor A, Conwell D, Singh V, Banks PA, Wu BU. Early readmission in acute pancreatitis: incidence and risk factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2492-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.234. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
PMID: 20531398BACKGROUNDRodriguez-Cerrillo M, Poza-Montoro A, Fernandez-Diaz E, Inurrieta-Romero A, Matesanz-David M. Home treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis. Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Jan;23(1):e10-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
PMID: 22153541BACKGROUNDvan Baal MC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, Schaapherder AF, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Gooszen HG, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):860-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182507646.
PMID: 22470079BACKGROUNDAndersson B, Pendse ML, Andersson R. Pancreatic function, quality of life and costs at long-term follow-up after acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct 21;16(39):4944-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i39.4944.
PMID: 20954281BACKGROUNDInce AT, Senturk H, Singh VK, Yildiz K, Danalioglu A, Cinar A, Uysal O, Kocaman O, Baysal B, Gurakar A. A randomized controlled trial of home monitoring versus hospitalization for mild non-alcoholic acute interstitial pancreatitis: a pilot study. Pancreatology. 2014 May-Jun;14(3):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
PMID: 24854612DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hakan Şentürk, Prof.
Bezmialem Vakıf University Hospital, Gastroenterology Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 30 Days
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asc Prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2013
First Posted
February 22, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
February 22, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-02