Safety of Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Tibial Shaft Fracture
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is a elevated risk of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) related to tibial shaft fractures due to oedema and reduced blood flow in traumatised tissues. This may lead to lack of oxygen and even necrosis. Symptoms of ACS are severe pain, hypoaesthesia, pain during flexion of the ankle and swollen leg in clinical examination. Paralysis and lack of distal pulses are late symptoms of ACS. Many experts think that effective relief of pain caused by regional anaesthesia (RA) may hide the symptoms of the ACS. This may be incorrect. The evidence of dangers related to RA is based on old patient-series and single case-reports. Some of these studies report the symptoms of ACS (hypaesthesia and even pain) being caused by RA. Majority of the conclusions in these studies cannot be confirmed by an expert of RA. It is also possible that there are more hemodynamic changes related to general anaesthesia (GA) which may predispose to ACS. There are no modern, randomized and controlled studies of the safety of RA in patients with tibial shaft fracture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedApril 17, 2019
April 1, 2019
7.8 years
February 15, 2013
April 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compartment pressure
Continuous measurement of anterior compartment pressure in the operated leg
0-24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
INVOS values after surgery
0-24 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Spinal anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORSpinal anesthesia
General anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral anesthesia with fentanyl, propofol and rocuronium and sevoflurane
Interventions
GA will be inducted by fentanyl, propofol and rocuronium. GA will be maintained by sevofluran, fentanyl and rocuronium.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a unilateral tibial shaft fracture which needs to be operated are included.
You may not qualify if:
- refusal of the patient
- severe, generalized atherosclerosis
- massive obesity
- marked mental retardation, dementia
- bilateral tibial shaft fracture
- polytrauma, such as head injury
- bleeding diathesis
- aortic stenosis
- infection at the injection site
- certain medications affecting bleeding
- sepsis
- hypovolemia
- conversion to general anaesthesia due to technical difficulties
- anesthesiologist has a strong opinion towards GA/RA
- foreign patient and marked translation difficulties
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, 90029, Finland
Related Publications (1)
Lehto PM, Vakkala MA, Lantto IP, Ohtonen P, Liisanantti JH, Kaakinen TI. Spinal Anaesthesia Versus General Anaesthesia for Patients With Tibia Shaft Fractures-A Randomized Controlled Study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Sep;69(8):e70111. doi: 10.1111/aas.70111.
PMID: 40792424DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Timo Kaakinen, MD, PhD
Oulu University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2013
First Posted
February 20, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 17, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04