Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Water vs. Air Method for Performing Colonoscopy in Adult Female Subjects
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective , single center, investigator initiated, randomized controlled trial to compare two methods of performing colonoscopy by experienced colonoscopist. Potential female subjects presenting for colonoscopy at UCD GI Lab will be presented with the study option and will be enrolled if they sign the informed consent. In recent years, the water infusion method has been reported to have several beneficial effects when studied in veteran patients. These include: significant reduction in discomfort to permit a significantly higher percentage (98% vs. 76%) of veterans to complete scheduled unsedated colonoscopy, lower sedation medication requirement when they accepted the option of minimal pre-medication sedation, more patients completing without sedation (78% vs 54%) when they accepted the on demand sedation and an increase in the yield of adenomas (a type of cancer seen in the colon) in screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Reviewers of the method have repeatedly called for studies using the method in female patients to confirm or refute the findings as most of the veteran patients are male patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedJune 27, 2017
June 1, 2017
3.6 years
January 17, 2013
June 26, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cecal intubation
Examination of the cecum by endoscopy
Three years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Amount of opiate and benzodiazepines used for sedation.
Three years
Other Outcomes (1)
Patient discomfort Patient pain rating during and after procedure
Three years
Study Arms (2)
water colonoscopy
EXPERIMENTALThe water (study) method: Warm water (body temperature) will be infused into colon to open the lumen for water infusion colonoscopy. Higher rate of complete colonoscopy will be achieved.
Air Colonoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe air (conventional) method: Air is pumped gently (insufflation) into the colon will be used to open the inside space of the colon and aid in colonoscope insertion
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All female patients between the ages of 18 to 80 years scheduled for colonoscopy at UC Davis GI Lab.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to be randomized to the air or water colonoscopy method.
- Patients who are unable to respond to study questionnaires.
- Patients with partial colon resection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Surinder Mann, M.D.
UCD
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2013
First Posted
February 13, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06