NCT01735266

Brief Summary

In most of situation, left colon (especially SD junction) is considered the most difficult part of colonoscopy, where endoscopist may encounter difficulty for scope insertion and patients may feel pain or uncomfortable. It is suggested more than half of the whole time for scope insertion should be used in left colon. Many methods, such as water immersion, abdominal palpation, have been used to facilitate insertion in left colon. Colonoscopy with whole-colon water exchange method has been shown to be useful for reducing medication used, pain experienced during colonoscopy, increasing the success rate of cecum intubation and adenoma detection rate in sedated and unsedated patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. Exchange of water during scope insertion minimizes loop formation and prevents lengthening and distension of the colon during colonoscopy. This will facilitate the colonoscopy in average or difficult colonoscopy. However, it is not known whether the benefits of water exchange method of colonoscopy was mainly due to its effect on the left colon. We hypothesized that left-colon water exchange colonoscopy (LWE) may have the similar effect regarding the maximal pain score and mean pain score in unsedated patients compared with whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy (WWE). At the mean time, LWE may reduce the insertion time compared with WWE. Here we performed a prospective, randomized controlled study to investigate the efficacies of whole-colon water exchange, left-colon water exchange and air methods of colonoscopy on pain score and insertion time in unsedated outpatients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 23, 2012

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 28, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

September 12, 2013

Status Verified

September 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 23, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 11, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Colonoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cecum intubation time

    Insertion time from rectum to reach the cecum.

    up to three months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Pain scores

    up to two months

  • Polyp detection rate

    up to six months

  • Total procedure time

    up to two months

  • Cecal intubation rate

    up to two months

  • Withdrawal time

    up to two month

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Air colonoscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Air was insufflated during whole procedure of colonoscope insertion.

Other: Air colonoscopy

Whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy

EXPERIMENTAL

The air pump was turned off before colonoscopy. During the whole procedure of the scope insertion, residual air in lumen was suctioned and 37°C (maintained with a water bath) water was infused with a peristaltic pump to obtain lumen visualization. Air was insufflated until cecum was reached or appendix opening was seen.

Other: Water exchange colonoscopy

left-colon water exchange colonoscopy

EXPERIMENTAL

In the left side of colon (including descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum), water was infused instead of air to obtain lumen visualization as described above in whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy group.

Other: Water exchange colonoscopy

Interventions

Colonoscopy will be performed with conventional air insufflation during colonoscope insertion.

Air colonoscopy

Water exchange method (The air pump was turned off before colonoscopy. During colonoscope insertion, residual air in lumen was suctioned and 37°C water was infused into lumen to obtain lumen visualization) was used in whole or left colon. Air was insufflated until cecum was reached or appendix opening was seen.

Also known as: Water aided colonoscopy
Whole-colon water exchange colonoscopyleft-colon water exchange colonoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Outpatients with unsedated colonoscopy

You may not qualify if:

  • history of colon resection
  • severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumor
  • hemodynamic instability
  • current pregnancy
  • inability to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032, China

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Wang X, Luo H, Xiang Y, Leung FW, Wang L, Zhang L, Liu Z, Wu K, Fan D, Pan Y, Guo X. Left-colon water exchange preserves the benefits of whole colon water exchange at reduced cecal intubation time conferring significant advantage in diagnostic colonoscopy - a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;50(7):916-23. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1010569. Epub 2015 Feb 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PolypsPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Yanglin Pan, M.D.

    Air Force Military Medical University, China

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associated professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2012

First Posted

November 28, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

August 1, 2013

Study Completion

August 1, 2013

Last Updated

September 12, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-09

Locations