Left-colon WEC May Reduce Insertion Time Compared With Whole-colon WEC.
Comparative Efficacy of Whole-colon Water Exchange, Left-colon Water Exchange and Air Methods of Colonoscopy on Cecum Intubation in Unsedated Outpatients - - - a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trail
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In most of situation, left colon (especially SD junction) is considered the most difficult part of colonoscopy, where endoscopist may encounter difficulty for scope insertion and patients may feel pain or uncomfortable. It is suggested more than half of the whole time for scope insertion should be used in left colon. Many methods, such as water immersion, abdominal palpation, have been used to facilitate insertion in left colon. Colonoscopy with whole-colon water exchange method has been shown to be useful for reducing medication used, pain experienced during colonoscopy, increasing the success rate of cecum intubation and adenoma detection rate in sedated and unsedated patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. Exchange of water during scope insertion minimizes loop formation and prevents lengthening and distension of the colon during colonoscopy. This will facilitate the colonoscopy in average or difficult colonoscopy. However, it is not known whether the benefits of water exchange method of colonoscopy was mainly due to its effect on the left colon. We hypothesized that left-colon water exchange colonoscopy (LWE) may have the similar effect regarding the maximal pain score and mean pain score in unsedated patients compared with whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy (WWE). At the mean time, LWE may reduce the insertion time compared with WWE. Here we performed a prospective, randomized controlled study to investigate the efficacies of whole-colon water exchange, left-colon water exchange and air methods of colonoscopy on pain score and insertion time in unsedated outpatients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2013
CompletedSeptember 12, 2013
September 1, 2013
3 months
November 23, 2012
September 11, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cecum intubation time
Insertion time from rectum to reach the cecum.
up to three months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Pain scores
up to two months
Polyp detection rate
up to six months
Total procedure time
up to two months
Cecal intubation rate
up to two months
Withdrawal time
up to two month
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Air colonoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORAir was insufflated during whole procedure of colonoscope insertion.
Whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy
EXPERIMENTALThe air pump was turned off before colonoscopy. During the whole procedure of the scope insertion, residual air in lumen was suctioned and 37°C (maintained with a water bath) water was infused with a peristaltic pump to obtain lumen visualization. Air was insufflated until cecum was reached or appendix opening was seen.
left-colon water exchange colonoscopy
EXPERIMENTALIn the left side of colon (including descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum), water was infused instead of air to obtain lumen visualization as described above in whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy group.
Interventions
Colonoscopy will be performed with conventional air insufflation during colonoscope insertion.
Water exchange method (The air pump was turned off before colonoscopy. During colonoscope insertion, residual air in lumen was suctioned and 37°C water was infused into lumen to obtain lumen visualization) was used in whole or left colon. Air was insufflated until cecum was reached or appendix opening was seen.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatients with unsedated colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- history of colon resection
- severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumor
- hemodynamic instability
- current pregnancy
- inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032, China
Related Publications (1)
Wang X, Luo H, Xiang Y, Leung FW, Wang L, Zhang L, Liu Z, Wu K, Fan D, Pan Y, Guo X. Left-colon water exchange preserves the benefits of whole colon water exchange at reduced cecal intubation time conferring significant advantage in diagnostic colonoscopy - a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;50(7):916-23. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1010569. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
PMID: 25639787DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yanglin Pan, M.D.
Air Force Military Medical University, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associated professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2012
First Posted
November 28, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 12, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09